Foto eines Pflanzensprosses, der sich spiralenförmig entrollt
10.06.2024

How the circular economy works and what it can achieve in Germany

Circular economy and circular economy are terms that you come across more and more often in the context of sustainability. What is behind them, why is the circular economy presented as an important system change and what would it look like in everyday life?

Circular Economy and circular economy are terms that you come across more and more frequently in the context of sustainability.
What is behind them, why are
Circular Economy as an important system change and what would that look like in everyday life?
We have for you
a brief insight with the most important topics compiled.
One
really small. Dbecause the whole is so ramified and comprehensive that we could probably write a whole book about it.n couldnten

Circular economy and circular economy – what are they?

Circular economy and circular economy – what are they?

Let’s start with a classic definition.
Because – spoiler – the terms
Circular economy” and Circular Economy” are often used synonymously, but are strictly speaking different.

Circular Economy

Circular economy describes an economic model in which resources and products are used for as long as possible within a closed cycle.
Once they have reached the end of their useful life, they are not simply disposed of, but returned to the cycle – i.e. made usable again.

The reference point is ISO 59004:2024.
It describes the basic principles and concepts of the circular economy, but also provides assistance for implementation in the company.
Circular economy is defined here as:

“Economic system that takes a systemic approach to maintaining the cycle of resources by recovering, preserving or enhancing their value while contributing to sustainable development.”

The WWF‘s definition is somewhat clearer and more direct:

Circular Economy [ist] a regenerative system, powered by renewable energy, which replaces the current linear industrial model Take – produce – dispose replaced.
Materials are instead retained in the economy, products are shared, while waste and negative impacts are avoided.
CE creates positive effects and benefits for the environment and society and works within planetary boundaries.
It is made possible by rethinking the current understanding of growth and consumption.”

A helpful overview of all relevant standards relating to the circular economy can be found at the German Institute for Standardization (DIN).

For companies subject to CSRD, ESRS E5 (Resource use and circular economy) is also important in this context.

The ESRS at a glance

How are the ESRS structured, what information is required and how does double materiality work?
Our white paper explains it clearly!

Circular economy

Circular economy means exactly the same thing in theory.
In Germany, however, the circular economy actually only means avoiding waste:
The circular economy within the meaning of [the Circular Economy Act] is the prevention and recycling of waste.

If we talk about the circular economy here in Germany, the correct term would be “circular economy”.
After all, we like to make life difficult for ourselves with unwieldy terms.

However, when the term “circular economy” is used at EU level (e.g. on the website of the EU Commission or EU Parliament), it always refers to the circular economy in the true sense of the word.

Why do we need a circular economy?

Global consumption of raw materials has tripled since 1970.
We live and do business as if we had unlimited resources at our disposal.
Earth Overshoot Day – the day on which all resources are used up globally for the year – is taking place earlier and earlier.

What is no longer needed is disposed of and replaced by something new.
And then it disappears from the scene for us.
But it ends up somewhere else.
Europe exports around 3,000,000 kilograms of plastic waste to countries in the Global South every day.
This is sometimes referred to as
“Garbage colonialism” labeled.
And it doesn’t stop with plastic.
Growing mountains of old clothes, scrap metal, batteries, tires – our waste is piling up in other parts of the world.

On top of this comes the extraction of ever more resources for products that are produced in abundance worldwide.
Far too often, extraction and production go hand in hand with environmental damage and the violation of human rights.

The CSRD and supply chain directives such as the LkSG, CSDDD, CBAM and EUDR are intended to gradually prevent the latter.
However, what we actually need is a new economic system that tackles the underlying problems at the root.

Curtain up for circular economy.

Linear Economy vs. Recycling Economy vs. Circular Economy – from the 3 Rs to the 10 Rs

Our current economic system is a one-way street.
It is therefore also known as
“linear economy”.
There are already initial attempts to counteract the high consumption of raw materials and the throwaway mentality.
The focus here is on
currently mainly on the so-called 3 Rs:

  • Reduce – Reduce use of resources and materials through greater efficiency in product manufacture/use
  • Reuse – Reuse of products that are still in good condition
  • Recycle – Reuse materials in products of the same or lower quality

This gives rise to the recycling economy.
However, recycling only puts a slight damper on things.
In the end, there is still far too much waste piling up in mountains of garbage.
Only 7.2 percent of our materials are reused after use.

Illustration, die Linear Economy, Recycling Economy und Circular Economy gegenüberstellt. Linear Economy führt direkt zur Mülltonne, bei Recycling Economy ist noch ein kleiner Umweg drin und bei Circular Economy dreht sich der Produktlebenszyklus im Kreis; es landet nichts im Müll

Circular Economy goes a big step further and relies on 10 R:

  • Reduce – Reduce use of resources and materials through greater efficiency in product manufacture/use
  • Reuse – Reuse of products that are still in good condition
  • Recycle – Reuse materials in products of the same or lower quality
  • Refuse Avoid overconsumption by optimizing or innovating products and eliminating products
  • Rethink – Rethinking product use and manufacturing processes
  • Repair – Repair and maintenance of defective/damaged products
  • Refurbish – Refurbishing discarded products so that they can still be used
  • Remanufacture – Reuse of product parts in new products with the same function
  • Repurpose – Reuse of product parts in new products with a different function
  • Recover – Burning materials with energy recovery
Tabelle mit den 10 R der Circular Economy

The European Commission also lists 7 very similar pillars of the circular economy:

  1. Sustainable supply chains
  2. Ecodesign of products and services
  3. Industrial and territorial ecology, i.e. cooperation and exchange between companies
  4. Functional economic organization; i.e. sharing the benefits of products with others instead of owning your own products
  5. Responsible consumption
  6. Extend product service life
  7. Recycle

So much for the theory.
Now you’re probably asking yourself: what will it all look like in practice?
After all, a lot has to change for the circular economy to become a reality.
We need new processes and more durable, fully recyclable materials.
Not to mention a change in mindset.

Circular economy in practice

Action plan for the circular economy and national circular economy strategy

As part of the Green Deal, the EU 2020 has “Action Plan for the Circular Economy”, which aims to achieve a “carbon-neutral, ecologically sustainable and pollutant-free circular economy” by 2050.
Initial measures such as the extension of ecodesign regulations, the right to repair and the Green Claims Directive are already in force.

Your overview of the new Green Claims Directive

With the Green Claims Directive, the EU now provides a clear framework for sustainability claims.
Get a clear overview of the new Green Claims Directive and its consequences for your company in this factsheet!

The “National Circular Economy Strategy (NKWS)” is based on the EU action plan.
This is intended to create a future framework strategy for measures and targets to implement a circular economy in Germany.
The German government is working closely with industry and society on this.

The overarching objectives of the NKWS are:

  • Climate protection
  • Protection of biodiversity
  • Reducing species extinction and environmental pollution
  • Securing the supply of raw materials
  • Reduce GHG emissions

Model Germany Circular Economy

As the NKWS is still a work in progress, WWF Germany, together with the Öko-Institut, Fraunhofer ISI and the FU Berlin, has developed a roadmap for the circular economy in Germany – the “Model Germany Circular Economy (MDCE)“.
This comprehensive paper shows which measures, political strategies, targets and instruments could be used to achieve a circular economy by 2045.

Here is an overview of the most important findings.

The advantages of a circular economy compared to business as usual

  • The supply situation is easing for 29 out of 36 critical raw materials, and for 9 raw materials more than 50 percent of Germany’s demand could be reduced or covered
  • A CO₂-equivalent savings of up to 26 percent (186 million tons) are possible
  • We need 27 percent less raw materials (179 million tons), total material consumption is down by 26 percent (329 million tons)
  • We need 30 percent less land (8.5 million hectares)
  • The MDCE scenario could also be used to reduce emissions that are difficult to avoid
  • The modeled circular economy would avoid 26 percent (147 billion euros) of the climate damage costs caused by direct emissions – with indirect emissions 10.7 billion euros

What is currently hindering the circular economy

  • Passing on environmental costs (externalization)
  • Lack of infrastructure for circular products and processes
  • Lack of investment (e.g. in research and development) for a circular economy
  • Lack of transparency with regard to the transfer of information and data in the value chains
  • Long-term path dependencies due to investments in linear technologies
  • Lack of common standards for circular products

5 key strategies for implementing a circular economy

  1. Reduce resource flows
  2. Substitute materials
  3. Slowing down resource flows
  4. Intensify product use
  5. Closing resource cycles with high quality

Consumers, companies and politicians share responsibility

The circular economy must be considered from two perspectives:

  1. Behavior-based solutions – sustainable design of consumption
  2. Technology-based solutions – on the technical and production side

The paper emphasizes that the necessary changes in behaviour do not lie solely with consumers.
Both approaches require
political and entrepreneurial need for action that goes far beyond information instruments and should be controlled by regulatory and market-based instruments.

10 guiding political principles for the success of the circular economy

  1. Prioritize absolute reduction of resource consumption
  2. Set binding resource targets along the lines of climate targets
  3. Shaping the structural change triggered by the circular economy with specific policy instruments
  4. Creating conviction for comprehensive CE in social alliances
  5. Understanding education and knowledge transfer as the key to transformation
  6. Setting incentives for a change in values in companies
  7. Expanding the state’s role model function in procurement
  8. Strengthening regional value chains in Germany
  9. Provide financing and research & development for the transformation to a circular economy
  10. Germany must assume greater international responsibility

Conclusion: We still have a long way to go!

Looking at our current economic model and the MDCE draft, it is clear that we still have a lot of work to do to achieve a truly sustainable transformation.
It can only succeed if we all – consumers, companies and politicians – work hand in hand.
Let’s get started!

Read more:

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Trusted by 250+ customers

Get to know the software!

Stakeholder-Anforderungen von ESG-Informationen an KMU
12.02.2024

5 reasons why a sustainability report is also worthwhile for SMEs

Many companies – large and small – are affected by sustainability regulations such as the CSRD, the LkSG or the upcoming European supply chain law CSDDD. But what about those that are not subject to these regulations? Are they exempt from reporting?

Watch out: Not being directly affected does not mean that you do not have to deal with sustainability! We explain here why SMEs also have to provide sustainability data and what information is required.

Which stakeholders request ESG data from SMEs

1. business partners create transparency in the supply chain

Are you a supplier to another company?
Many SMEs supply larger companies that fall under the LkSG (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz) and are or will be affected by the EU CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) and CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive).
Large companies not only have to make their own ESG information transparent, but also that of their suppliers.
This means that you are also affected by the requirements of the regulations and will be asked by your customers for comprehensive sustainability information.
As a result, you have to undergo extensive due diligence checks, such as the EcoVadis sustainability assessment, which identifies potential risks for people and the environment in the supply chain.
Incidentally, it is not only you as a supplier who must provide evidence, but often also sub-suppliers.
Your customers are also bound by industry-specific guidelines and laws.
Sustainability information from the supply chain is also required from this side.
Examples of this include the Agricultural Organizations and Supply Chain Act (AgrarOLkG), the chemical industry standard or the industry-specific guidelines of the OEC.  

2. financial sector pays more attention to sustainable investments

SMEs that are supported by investors or have received project-related investments should definitely be prepared for ESG inquiries.
The reasons for this:

  • Due to the SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation), financial market players and financial advisors are obliged to provide ESG information on financial products and services.
  • Investors are themselves capital market participants and must report on sustainability goals and positioning within the financial sector.
  • Rating agencies now also include ESG criteria in their investment ratings.
  • Prior to the final M&A transaction, the sustainability strategy is reviewed – if not already requested in advance, measurable sustainability indicators are required from you by then at the latest.

All information about the SFDR

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) is one of the EU’s levers for promoting a sustainable economy.
Get an overview of the SFDR, the categorization of financial products and the disclosure requirements with our factsheet.

3. banks require ESG disclosures in loan and funding procedures

If you want to apply for a loan or a grant from the bank, you will need a number of documents.
In the past, it was mainly about creditworthiness, business concept, collateral and the like.
Today, the issue of sustainability also plays a decisive role.
This is because banks need sustainability information from you when granting loans in order to meet the requirements of the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin).
In addition, banks are increasingly adhering to self-imposed frameworks and sustainable finance targets.
In practice, this means that lending costs are directly influenced by your ESG rating: better rating, cheaper loan.

This data decides on loans

Read this article to find out how ESG data affects financing and what data companies need to provide now to ensure their loan applications continue to be approved.

4. insurance companies also include ESG risks in their financial statements

Insurance companies also rely on and request ESG data from customers.
Two perspectives need to be understood here: Firstly, (re)insurers also fall under the CSRD reporting obligation.
They must therefore report on the status quo of their sustainability ambitions themselves.
This also includes the customer area, for which your insurer naturally needs information from you as a customer.
The second perspective is about the insurance risk when you want to take out a new insurance policy.
It is common practice here to first assess the risk potential of an insured person.
Sustainability risks are now also taken into account.
Anyone who does not have this issue on their radar may be classified as having a higher insurance risk and lower insurance benefits.  

5. customers and partners expect proof of ESG efforts

New partnerships, collaborations and tenders are increasingly demanding certifications that prove a company’s sustainability ambitions.
When you enter into negotiations, you need to be well prepared:

  • No Open Doors without ESG certifications: In addition to known information security standards, for example, certifications from the ESG sector are increasingly a prerequisite for a serious discussion.
    Go through the assessments at an early stage – they are often lengthy and cannot be “handed in quickly”.
  • Sustainability and ESG criteria in the tendering process: If there is a tender, your company could fall out of the selection process due to a missing or unsound sustainability strategy.
    You can prove this with recognized ESG certificates, among other things.
    With sustainability and ESG criteria in tendering processes, companies want to ensure that ecological and social standards are adhered to in the supply chain right from the start.

In addition to special ESG certifications, ESG criteria are also asked for in other quality standards that have a high priority in the industry and are actually “only” concerned with corporate processes:

  • Fairtrade
  • Organic certifications
  • Employer rankings
  • ISO standards

CSRD compliance made easy

From the CSRD basics to the finished report: Our practical software package guides you step by step to CSRD compliance!

How do SMEs best prepare for sustainability requirements from stakeholders?

As you can see, sustainability issues come from every corner.
You not only have to collect and communicate ESG data to fulfill legal requirements – keyword: LkSG, CSDDD and CSRD-compliant.
Your stakeholders also ask for this data for a variety of reasons.
The problem with these queries is that if SMEs are affected by one or more of these scenarios and are not prepared for them, this usually means a lot of work.
This is because very different information is required from different stakeholders.
They are confronted with different reporting standards and find themselves in a flood of questionnaires.
However, you can avoid these problems with a voluntary sustainability report.
It is best to report in accordance with a recognized standard that is suitable for your company, such as the DNK, the GRI Standards or the ESRS – the latter will enable you to meet the regulatory requirements of the CSRD in the future.
Frameworks such as the SDGs or the UN Global Compact also form a good basis for the sustainability report.
EFRAG is currently also working on its own voluntary standards(VSME) for SMEs, which are adapted to the size, resources and needs of these companies.
The advantages of a voluntary report in a nutshell:

  • As a rule, you already collect all the important data that you also need for other purposes.
    In the best case even in a single tool, in which you can also control measures and write the report.
  • In the case of inquiries, the report already contains most of the required information, giving you more time for detailed questions.
  • If you do have to report later, you are already optimally prepared for CSRD, LkSG and CSDDD!
  • Although this may sound like a lot of effort at first, the introduction of ESG structures brings with it great opportunities: innovation and long-term growth are promoted, risks are minimized and, not to forget, you also consolidate and strengthen relationships with your customers.

Step-by-step to the sustainability report

A meaningful sustainability report can be quite a challenge. Where do you start? What data is important? And how should the CSR report be published? Our practice-oriented playbook answers your questions.

Do you want to be prepared for the next request?

The voluntary sustainability report puts you ahead of the game!
If you have any questions about the sustainability report or the legal requirements, we are here for you – with over 12 years of experience in sustainability management.

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Trusted by 250+ customers

Get to know the software!

Mann sitzt nachdenklich am Laptop – die Risikoanalyse für das LkSG ist mit vielen Fragen verbunden
11.01.2023

Kickstart LkSG – This is what matters

The LkSG came into force on January 1, 2023. We have summarized the current information on the law for you.

The much-discussed Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) came into force for companies on January 1, 2023.
In addition to clarifying some basic questions in order to prepare for the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, it is important to stay informed about important innovations.
We have summarized the latest information on the law.  

Important deadlines for compliance with the law

By when must the due diligence obligations be fulfilled?

Companies that have been subject to the Supply Chain Act since January 1, 2023 do not yet have to have fully complied with all due diligence obligations.
Only the responsibility for monitoring risk management must already be defined and the complaints mechanism established.
All other obligations only need to be implemented in the course of the first audit year.
If your company has fewer than 3,000 and more than 1,000 employees at German locations, it will not be subject to the law until January 1, 2024.

When does the reporting obligation apply?

The following applies to all reports that are to be submitted to the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA) and published on the company’s website between January 1, 2023 and June 1, 2024: BAFA will not verify the submission of the reports to BAFA and their publication until the deadline of January 1, 2025.
Further information and detailed answers can be obtained from the BMAS.

Practical guide to LkSG compliance

How to implement the risk analysis according to the LkSG efficiently and legally compliant – in 6 steps.

How should the term “appropriateness” be interpreted?

In addition, the BAFA has explained the principle of appropriateness stipulated by the Supply Chain Act in more detail in a new guidance document.
According to this, companies are generally obliged to observe due diligence obligations within their supply chains in a manner that is appropriate (for them) in order to prevent, minimize or eliminate human rights or environmental risks.
The aim of this is to give each company the necessary discretion and room for maneuver with regard to the implementation of due diligence obligations.
According to the LkSG, companies do not have to guarantee that their entire supply chain is completely free of human rights violations or environmental damage.
Rather, they must ensure that they take appropriate measures according to their individual business activities to identify and address potential risks.
The due diligence obligations of the LkSG therefore establish a duty of care for companies.
However, should a breach occur in the domestic business area, remedial action must be taken immediately.
The duty of care alone is not sufficient here.  

What is the assessment of appropriateness based on?

According to LkSG § 3 para.
2, the appropriateness of an action that complies with the duty of care is based on the following criteria:

  1. Nature and scope of the company’s business activities
  2. The company’s ability to influence the direct perpetrator of a human rights or environmental risk or the violation of a human rights or environmental obligation
  3. Typical expected severity of the violation, the reversibility of the violation and the likelihood of a violation of a human rights-related or environmental obligation
  4. Nature of the company’s causal contribution to the human rights or environmental risk or to the violation of a human rights or environmental obligation

There is no fixed order for these appropriateness criteria.
Instead, companies must decide on an ongoing basis how and in what order to address them, based on their individual risks and violations.
The principle of appropriateness is closely linked to that of effectiveness.
Accordingly, companies may only make an appropriate selection from effective measures.  

How is the vulnerability risk assessed?

In principle, the more susceptible a company’s business activities or supply chain structure is to human rights or environmental risks, the greater the efforts that can be expected of this company to prevent, stop or minimize these violations.
The factors listed below serve as examples for assessing the respective vulnerability risk:

  • Activities in or procurement from risky countries
  • Activity in or affiliation to a risky sector
  • Contact with conflict minerals
  • Use of hazardous machinery and/or chemicals
  • High proportion of low-skilled, manual work

 

What needs to be considered in the risk analysis?

In addition, companies are obliged to carry out an appropriate risk analysis.
In this case, the criteria of appropriateness control the varying intensity of the investigative efforts.
Here, too, it can be generally said that a correspondingly more intensive risk assessment must be carried out for high-risk suppliers.
It is, of course, inadmissible to limit the risk analysis only to players over whom there is direct influence.
You can find out more about risk analysis in our practical guide LkSG Compliance.
Would you like to find out more? Get in touch with us.  

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Best practices in the areas of ESG and sustainable supply chains
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Sustainability events and much more.

Get to know the software!

Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO
05.01.2023

The importance and future of sustainable supply chains: Interview with Klaus Wiesen

In this interview, Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chain at VERSO, answers relevant questions on the challenges and solutions for more sustainability in supply chains and the role of the supply chain in the future viability of companies.

Companies currently have to deal with several requirements. In addition to the German Supply Chain Act, the CSRD, which has been in force since 2024, is on the table, while CBAM and EUDR also pose new challenges. The CSDDD is on the horizon. In this interview, Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chain at VERSO, answers relevant questions on the challenges and solutions for more sustainability in supply chains, the role of the supply chain in the future viability of companies and how the VERSO Supply Chain Hub supports the implementation of sustainability requirements and legal requirements such as the LkSG or the CSRD now and in the future.  

7 questions for Klaus Wiesen on challenges and opportunities in the supply chain

1. Why is the supply chain so important for protecting the climate and human rights?

On average, more than 80 per cent of CO2 emissions in the value chain come from the supply chain. The supply chain also plays a key role when it comes to respecting human rights and protecting biodiversity. Sustainable companies and sustainable products are only possible with a sustainable supply chain – which makes the supply chain a decisive factor for the future viability of companies.

2. What obligations do companies face with regard to their supply chains now and in the future?

The obligations are extensive. A lot has happened in terms of regulation. For example, the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) requires companies to report extensively on their commitment to sustainability, with the supply chain forming an important part of the reporting. In addition, the member states have agreed on the EU Supply Chain Act (European Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence) and the EU law to stop deforestation has been passed. Last but not least, the German Supply Chain Act, the “Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz” (LkSG), came into force on January 1, 2023. All of this ensures that companies are required to procure in a way that takes climate neutrality, environmental protection and respect for human rights fully into account. The biggest challenge for companies in fulfilling the upcoming obligations is that a supply chain cannot be made sustainable in the blink of an eye. The transition to a sustainable supply chain takes time. Accordingly, sustainable procurement cannot be achieved in a one-off project, but the path to it requires new structures within the company and continuously ties up resources. It is important that companies start early enough. Due to the current crises, however, the opposite is often the case: the issue of sustainability is put off for as long as possible. This will backfire on companies later on.

3. What are the most important steps in achieving sustainable procurement and which departments should be involved?

In purely organisational terms, purchasing should always be involved with a central function, especially as purchasing typically maintains the most intensive contact with suppliers. It is therefore important to build up sustainability expertise in purchasing – in addition to close coordination with the CSR department, if this already exists in the company. For procurement, this is an opportunity to reposition itself strategically within the company.
Transparency is also required in the supply chain: where are the suppliers’ production sites located and who is the right contact person for sustainability at suppliers? Which sustainability standards do the suppliers fulfil? And do their own suppliers in turn purchase from sustainable sources? In most cases, companies do not have the answers today.

4. How can such transparency be achieved across the supply chain?

One key to transparency is co-operation with suppliers. It is no longer just information on price or quality that needs to be obtained from suppliers. Sustainability information is also required. And not just one-off information on how risky suppliers are. A continuous assessment and development of suppliers in terms of sustainability is required. Many companies shy away from the effort involved in collecting data – for fear of high costs and negative reactions from suppliers. At VERSO, however, we see every day that the effort involved in collecting data via our cloud platform is minimal – both for our customers and for suppliers – and the feedback from suppliers is positive.

5. How does VERSO support data collection along the supply chain?

VERSO provides support at various levels: In view of the many regulatory requirements, it is very challenging for companies to define the scope of the required information. In addition, the requirements are dynamic and new laws and standards are constantly being added. Sustainability standards are currently still in their infancy. The scope of the data query must therefore be continuously supplemented or adapted. The VERSO Supply Chain Hub receives standardized self-disclosures on all relevant sustainability requirements. The questionnaires are sent automatically, data is collected and evaluated. In addition to information on which sustainability requirements a company fulfills, VERSO also helps to create transparency in the upstream supply chain. This is where the risks are sometimes greatest. If the company procures high-risk raw materials, it is essential to create transparency for the supply chains of the raw materials.

6. What opportunities does sustainable supply chain management offer, even if your own company is not affected by the LkSG?

First of all, companies that are not covered by the LkSG will most likely have to fulfil reporting obligations in accordance with the CSRD, which also applies to capital market-oriented SMEs. And the European Supply Chain Act also applies to more companies than the LkSG. But regardless of whether companies are affected by regulation or not, there are many reasons for sustainable supply chain management: I currently see the greatest opportunity in differentiating ourselves from the competition – precisely because corporate customers and consumers are paying more attention to this. In addition, the crisis has shown that companies with sustainable procurement are more resilient, meaning they have had fewer supply disruptions. And with rising CO2 prices and the planned ‘Carbon Border Tax’ (CBAM), companies that are already implementing climate targets for the supply chain will be affected by significantly lower cost increases.

7. To what extent can companies position themselves for the future with VERSO when it comes to sustainability requirements in the supply chain?

Our promise to our customers is that all sustainability requirements for the supply chain can be covered with VERSO now and in the future. The VERSO Supply Chain Hub already covers the topic of due diligence as required by the LkSG as well as climate protection and the recording of CO2 footprints, biodiversity or simply the question of where certain raw materials come from. The platform therefore offers the ideal starting point for meeting the reporting requirements of the CSRD, the EU Supply Chain Act or the EU law to stop deforestation. And, of course, to go beyond regulatory requirements and differentiate yourself from the competition.

Practical guide LkSG Compliance

Find out how to implement the risk analysis in accordance with the LkSG efficiently and in line with legal requirements.

Sign up to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Trusted by 250+ customers

Get to know the software!

Risikoanalyse nach LkSG: Das sagt das BAFA – Symbolbild von Frachtcontainern
11.10.2022

LkSG-Risikoanalyse – Was sagt die BAFA-Handreichung?

„Risiken ermitteln, gewichten und priorisieren – Handreichung zur Umsetzung einer Risikoanalyse nach den Vorgaben des Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetzes“, so lautet der Titel der sehnlichst erwarteten Handreichung des Bundesamtes für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA). Im Fokus der Handreichung steht die Risikoanalyse der menschenrechtlichen und umweltbezogen Risiken im eigenen Geschäftsbereich und in der Lieferkette.

Abstrakte, konkrete und anlassbezogene Risikoanalyse

Nach dem LkSG müssen Unternehmen nach § 4 LkSG ein angemessenes und wirksames Risikomanagement einrichten, um menschenrechtliche oder umweltbezogene Risiken oder Verletzungen zu erkennen. Diese Risikoanalyse ist jährlich bzw. anlassbezogen durchzuführen (§ 5 LkSG Abs. 4).

In Bezug auf die regelmäßige Risikoanalyse führt das BAFA eine wichtige Unterscheidung ein:

Die abstrakte Risikoanalyse

Hier wird aufgrund vorhandener Stammdaten, Einkaufsvolumen und ggf. unter Einbezug von Risikodaten eine erste Priorisierung vorgenommen. Diese Risikoanalyse reicht allerdings alleine nicht aus, sondern ist durch die konkrete Risikoanalyse zu plausibilisieren.

Die konkrete Risikoanalyse

Hier werden die Ergebnisse der abstrakten Risikoanalyse plausibilisiert. Hierbei spielt der spezifische Kontext, das heißt auch individuelle Primärinformationen über die Lieferanten, eine wichtige Rolle. Risiken sollen gewichtet und priorisiert werden und so das Gefahrenpotenzial eingeschätzt werden. Hierbei spielen Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit und Schwere der Verletzung eine wichtige Rolle.

Die anlassbezogene Risikoanalyse

Des Weiteren ist anlassbezogen eine Risikoanalyse durchzuführen. Dies gilt entweder bei Veränderung der Geschäftstätigkeit oder bei substituierter Kenntnis von Verletzungen einer menschenrechtlichen oder umweltbezogenen Pflicht bei einem oder mehreren mittelbaren Zulieferern.

Darüber hinaus enthält die Handreichung hilfreiche Informationen zu den Daten, die zur Beschaffungsstruktur erfasst werden sollten sowie im Anhang II einen Überblick über Umsetzungshilfen (Berichte und Leitfäden) für die Ermittlung von menschenrechtlichen und umweltbezogenen Risiken.

Whitepaper:
Risikomanagement für Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette

So setzen Sie die Anforderungen des Lieferkettengesetzes durch ­Digitalisierung und Kollaboration zukunftsfähig um!

Wie unterstützt VERSO die verschiedenen Risikoanalysen?

Sowohl für die abstrakte als auch für die konkrete Risikoanalyse sind eine Vielzahl von Daten effizient einzuholen und auszuwerten. Unsere Cloud Plattform unterstützt hier optimal.

Abstrakte Risikoanalyse: Wesentliche länderbasierte Risikoindizes sind in der VERSO Supply Chain Plattform integriert und können mittels einer Heat Map übersichtlich ausgewertet werden. So können Sie ihre Lieferantendaten zielgerichtet ergänzen.

Konkrete Risikoanalyse: Hier unterstützten wir im Kern, indem Sie Lieferanten mit abstrakten Risiken ganz einfach in die Überprüfung geben können, und mittels Selbstauskünften und Nachweisen eine Aussage zu den getroffenen Maßnahmen zur Risikominimierung erhalten. Die kritischen Lieferanten lassen sich dann anhand der geographischen Lage der Betriebsstätten und den verbundenen Länderrisiken und der Beschäftigtenzahl noch weiter priorisieren.

Anlassbezogene Risikoanalyse: Unser Lieferketten-Mapping ermöglicht die schnelle Überprüfung von Risiken bei substantiierter Kenntnis von Verstößen bei mittelbaren Zulieferern. Ergänzen Sie ihre Risikoanalyse zudem jederzeit für neue Geschäftsbereiche, in dem Sie neuen Lieferanten auf die Plattform einladen.


* Bei diesen Informationen handelt es sich um redaktionell zusammengefassten Content, der nicht als Rechtsberatung zu verstehen ist. VERSO übernimmt keine Haftung. 

Abonnieren Sie unsere Newsletter!

Tragen Sie sich ein und erhalten Sie regelmäßig Neuigkeiten zu:

  • Aktuellen ESG-Themen und Gesetzesänderungen
  • Best Practices aus den Bereichen ESG und nachhaltige Lieferketten
  • News zu VERSO
  • Sustainability Events uvm.

Jetzt anmelden!

In 10 Schritten auf das Lieferkettengesetz vorbereiten
30.09.2022

Prepare for the Supply Chain Act in 10 steps

The Supply Chain Duty of Care Act, or Supply Chain Act (LkSG) for short, has been in force since January 1, 2023. We have answered some important questions for you.

Since January 1, 2023, the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, or Supply Chain Act (LkSG) for short, has been in force to regulate corporate responsibility for compliance with human rights in supply chains for the first time. To help you navigate and prepare for the regulatory developments surrounding the LkSG, we have answered some important questions for you.

Questions and answers on the Supply Chain Act

1. Why does Germany need a supply chain law?

In the course of globalization, German companies source raw materials and products from all over the world. In addition, investments are made in foreign production and distribution facilities and goods are exported worldwide. In the process, human rights and environmental protection violations are occurring more and more frequently. These have their origins in the constantly increasing competitive and price pressure to which globally active companies are exposed. Up to now, companies have only borne minimal responsibility for the impact of their business activities abroad. Attempts to voluntarily implement protective measures against human rights and environmental protection violations have failed miserably. A binding framework is therefore needed to oblige companies to take greater care with regard to these issues.

2. which human rights and environmental standards must be taken into account by companies in this context?

The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act obliges German companies to comply with internationally recognized human rights abroad as well. This includes, for example, the right to physical integrity, the prohibition of forced and child labor and the right to health. With regard to the environmental standards to be observed, the locally applicable regulations on environmental protection and individual environmental standards from international agreements apply.

3. which companies are affected by the Supply Chain Act?

The law will be introduced in stages, starting on 01.01.2023. Initially, German companies with more than 3000 employees will be affected. From 01.01.2024, the scope will be extended to companies with more than 1000 employees. Even if smaller companies (SMEs) are not yet directly covered by the Supply Chain Act, they can be required to implement due diligence obligations as suppliers to affected companies.

Risk management in the supply chain

Implement the Supply Chain Act in a future-proof way: with a holistic, risk-oriented approach. Find out more in the whitepaper.

4. What are companies liable for?

Companies should not only take responsibility for damage caused by themselves, but also for damage caused along the supply chain by subsidiaries, important business partners or suppliers. Transparency within the supply chain is therefore more important than ever before. In principle, however, companies are only liable for damage where they have acted negligently or deliberately breached their duty of care.

5. must business relationships be terminated in the event of violations?

That is not the goal. The primary aim is to permanently anchor awareness of human rights and environmental protection measures within the supplier companies. Business relationships are only to be terminated completely if a serious human rights violation has been identified that persists even after a deadline has been set.

6. What does the Supply Chain Act mean for the competitiveness of affected companies?

The Supply Chain Act will bring more fairness to competition. At present, companies that act conscientiously are at a competitive disadvantage compared to companies that act irresponsibly due to higher costs. This is to be prevented with uniform rules for all.

7. What impact can the LkSG have in the producing countries?

The Supply Chain Act is primarily intended to protect local people. The legislation is intended to improve working conditions for employees in production facilities, as companies are then obliged to comply with social and environmental standards. Residents living in the vicinity of the factories will also benefit if, for example, they are no longer allowed to exceed certain exhaust emission values.

Factsheet: EU Supply Chain Act vs. LkSG

The EU Supply Chain Act (en. Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)) is to become the European framework for the German Supply Chain Act. You can find everything you need to know in the factsheet.

8. Who controls the law?

Compliance with and implementation of the law is monitored by the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA). Companies are obliged to submit their report at least four months after the end of the financial year. In addition, the authority has the possibility, among other things, to specify concrete actions to companies, summon persons, demand information and impose fines of up to EUR 50,000 for enforcement.

9. What penalties do companies have to fear?

Failure to comply with the legal obligations could result in fines of up to 8 million euros, or 2% of annual global turnover for companies with an annual turnover of more than 400 million euros. For the time being, the German law does not provide for civil liability, although this is likely to change with legislation at European level.

10. how can the VERSO Supply Chain Platform simplify the implementation of the LkSG?

Recurring requirements such as risk analyses, implementation of preventive measures or the annual reporting obligation are effort drivers for purchasing, as they require the collection and evaluation of supplier data. With the automation of the VERSO Supply Chain Platform, considerable resources can be saved and an efficient, holistic implementation of the LkSG and all ESG topics can be guaranteed. The VERSO Supply Chain Platform enables a future-proof approach with which purchasing organizations are also optimally prepared for future requirements such as the CSRD and the EU Supply Chain Act. Contact us to find out how VERSO can help you capture the necessary data in your supply chain, qualify suppliers and provide the necessary reporting metrics with minimal effort.

 

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

Book a demo!

Register now to arrange a free demo appointment and get to know our solutions at first hand.

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Trusted by 250+ customers

Get to know the software!

Containerschiff als Symbolbild für Lieferketten
30.08.2021

Erklärung für das Lieferkettengesetz: Was Unternehmen beachten müssen

Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte beeinflussen immer stärker das Einkaufsverhalten der Kunden. Unternehmen müssen deswegen auch in ihrer Lieferkette auf Themen wie CO2-Reduktion und Einhaltung von Menschenrechten achten. Experte Klaus Wiesen gibt eine Erklärung, welche Unternehmen vom Lieferkettengesetz betroffen sind und was sie beachten müssen.

Für welche Unternehmen gilt das Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz, kurz das Lieferkettengesetz? Und ab wann?

Das Gesetz gilt ab 2023 für Unternehmen mit Hauptsitz in Deutschland und für in Deutschland registrierte Unternehmen mit über 3000 Mitarbeitern. Ab 2024 liegt der Schwellenwert bei 1000 Mitarbeitern. Indirekt sind aber sehr viel mehr Unternehmen betroffen: Entweder als Zulieferer, der Anforderungen von unter das Gesetz fallende Kunden erfüllen muss, oder als Unternehmen, das in Sachen Nachhaltigkeitsstandards mit größeren Wettbewerbern mitziehen sollte.

Die neuen Sorgfaltspflichten beziehen sich auf verschiedene Ebenen der Lieferketten. Welche sind das?

Die Lieferkette bezieht sich auf alle Produkte und Dienstleistungen eines Unternehmens. Das Gesetz umfasst das Handeln des eigenen Geschäftsbereichs und das der unmittelbaren Zulieferer sowie in einigen Fällen auch der mittelbaren Zulieferer.

Ich empfehle Unternehmen aber, sich nicht in den Details des LkSG zu verlieren. Entscheidend ist es, jetzt ein robustes Risikomanagement in Einklang mit den UN Guiding Principles (UN-Leitprinzipien für Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte) aufzubauen, und so auch Anforderungen anderer nationaler Gesetze sowie des kommenden Gesetzes auf der EU-Ebene an die menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht zu erfüllen.

Die neuen Sorgfaltspflichten beziehen sich auf verschiedene Ebenen der Lieferketten. Welche sind das?

Die Lieferkette bezieht sich auf alle Produkte und Dienstleistungen eines Unternehmens. Das Gesetz umfasst das Handeln des eigenen Geschäftsbereichs und das der unmittelbaren Zulieferer sowie in einigen Fällen auch der mittelbaren Zulieferer.

Ich empfehle Unternehmen aber, sich nicht in den Details des LkSG zu verlieren. Entscheidend ist es, jetzt ein robustes Risikomanagement in Einklang mit den UN Guiding Principles (UN-Leitprinzipien für Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte) aufzubauen, und so auch Anforderungen anderer nationaler Gesetze sowie des kommenden Gesetzes auf der EU-Ebene an die menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht zu erfüllen.

Die betroffenen Unternehmen müssen künftig eine Risikoanalyse ihrer Lieferkette vornehmen. Auf welche möglichen Missstände müssen sie dabei achten?

Unternehmen müssen in der Risikoanalyse menschenrechtliche und umweltbezogene Risiken beachten. Menschenrechtliche Risiken können zum Beispiel Kinderarbeit, Zwangsarbeit oder missachteter Arbeitsschutz sein. Auf die Umwelt bezogen sind das beispielsweise die Verschmutzung von Luft oder Gewässern, aber auch das unsachgemäße Entsorgen von Abfällen.  

Mit welchen Konsequenzen müssen Unternehmen rechnen, wenn sie die neuen Regeln des Lieferkettengesetzes nicht (rechtzeitig) einhalten?

Verstößt ein Unternehmen gegen das Gesetz können je nach Schwere des Verstoßes Geldstrafen bis zu 8 Millionen Euro verhängt werden. Für Unternehmen mit einem Jahresumsatz von mehr als 400 Millionen Euro kann die Strafe bis zu 2 Prozent des jährlichen Umsatzes betragen. Außerdem droht der Ausschluss von öffentlichen Auftragsvergaben.

Doch es geht um viel mehr, als nur Strafen zu vermeiden. Es droht der Verlust der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, sollte Nachhaltigkeit nicht ernst genommen werden. Somit sollten Unternehmen das Gesetz als Chance sehen, sich jetzt für die Zukunft aufzustellen. 

 

Welchen Schritt sollten Unternehmen als Erstes machen, um die neuen Regeln ab Inkrafttreten einzuhalten?

Zunächst sollten die Verantwortlichkeiten im Unternehmen festgelegt werden. Das LkSG erfordert das Benennen einer oder eines Menschenrechtsbeauftragten. Doch ich empfehle, es nicht dabei zu belassen. Es gilt insbesondere, den Einkauf miteinzubeziehen und Prozesse für eine nachhaltige Beschaffung zu etablieren.

 

Auch auf europäischer Ebene wird über ein Lieferkettengesetz diskutiert. Müssen deutsche Unternehmen dann mit noch schärferen Regeln rechnen?

Ja, davon ist auszugehen. Das Thema Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette wird aber nicht nur durch dieses Gesetz weiter an Bedeutung gewinnen. Der fortschreitende Klimawandel   erfordert die Dekarbonisierung von globalen Lieferketten, weshalb fast jedes Unternehmen tätig werden muss. Und wer Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette adressiert, sollte sich nicht nur auf einen Nachhaltigkeitsaspekt beschränken.

Egal ob Klimaschutz oder menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht, es bedarf dafür zum einen klarer Prozesse und zum anderen Transparenz in der Vorlieferkette. Hat man diese Grundlagen erreicht, lassen sich alle Nachhaltigkeitsthemen proaktiv managen.

Consulting

Klaus Wiesen

Klaus Wiesen ist Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO. Er war Mitgründer von sustainabill, das nun als Teil von VERSO unseren Kunden dabei hilft, Transparenz in Lieferketten zu bringen und so Risiken zu managen, Menschenrechte sicherzustellen und Klima-Emissionen zu verringern. Vor der Gründung von sustainabill war er Teamleiter beim Wuppertal Institut, einem international führenden Think Tank für anwendungsorientierte Nachhaltigkeitsforschung. Klaus Wiesen ist außerdem einer von neun Nachhaltigkeitsexpert:innen beim 12-Wochen-Programm der VERSO Academy.

Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO

* Bei diesen Informationen handelt es sich um redaktionell zusammengefassten Content, der nicht als Rechtsberatung zu verstehen ist. VERSO übernimmt keine Haftung. 

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter!

Tragen Sie sich ein und erhalten Sie regelmäßig Neuigkeiten zu:

  • Aktuellen ESG-Themen und Gesetzesänderungen
  • Best Practices aus den Bereichen ESG und nachhaltige Lieferketten
  • News zu VERSO
  • Sustainability Events uvm.

Jetzt anmelden!