Ein Mann führt einen anderen durch eine Fabrikhalle. Symbolbild für Lieferantenbeziehungen. Darauf der Text: Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette – Best Practices im Supplier Management
20.12.2024

Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette: Best Practices im Supplier Management

Supplier Management ist der Schlüssel zur ESG-Compliance. Lesen Sie, wie Sie gezielt Ihre Lieferantenbeziehungen stärken.

Ihre Lieferkette ist nur so stark wie ihr schwächstes Glied. Doch wie sorgen Sie dafür, dass Sie sich bei der Nachhaltigen Transformation Ihrer Supply Chain auf die Lieferanten verlassen können? Supplier Management ist der Schlüssel – dieser Beitrag zeigt, wie Sie Transparenz schaffen, Risiken minimieren und Ihre Lieferantenbeziehungen mit dem VERSO Supply Chain Hub strategisch stärken.

Warum Lieferanten Teil der Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie sein sollten

Nachhaltige Lieferketten sind Teamwork. Wer hier vorankommen will, muss eng mit den Lieferanten zusammenarbeiten. Zwei Gründe sprechen besonders dafür.

Lieferkettentransparenz braucht Zusammenarbeit

Die CSRD verlangt Unternehmen umfassende Transparenz in der gesamten Wertschöpfungskette ab. Ohne die aktive Zusammenarbeit mit Lieferanten ist es nahezu unmöglich, entsprechende Prozesse zu schaffen und die notwendigen Informationen zu Arbeitsbedingungen, CO₂-Emissionen oder Produkt-Compliance zu erhalten..

Eine Kette ist nur so stark wie ihr schwächstes Glied

Zweiter Aspekt: Soll ihre gesamte Lieferkette nachhaltig werden, muss auch jeder Teil dieser Lieferkette nachhaltig sein. Klingt erst einmal völlig logisch. In der Praxis bedeutet das: Nachhaltigkeit sollten Sie nicht nur top-down vorgeben, und hoffen, dass Ihre Vorstellungen umgesetzt werden. Sehen Sie es vielmehr als Projekt, an dem Sie gemeinsam mit Ihren Lieferanten arbeiten. Das heißt z.B. auch, dass einige Lieferanten bei der Nachhaltigen Transformation stark entwickelt werden müssen. Denn nur wenn Sie im Rahmen des Supplier Managements jedes Glied ihrer Kette stärken, ist die Resilienz wirklich gegeben.

Herausforderungen im Supplier Management

Ein effektives Supplier Management zu etablieren, ist einfacher gesagt als getan. Unternehmen stehen häufig vor Problemen wie schlechter Datenqualität, komplexen Anforderungen und mangelnden Prozessen. Doch mit den richtigen Ansätzen lassen sich diese Herausforderungen bewältigen.

Lückenhafte Daten und fehlende Transparenz

Ein häufiges Problem im Lieferantenmanagement ist der Mangel an belastbaren Daten. Häufig fehlen präzise Informationen zu Arbeitsbedingungen, CO₂-Emissionen oder Produkt-Compliance. Einmal jährlich Daten abzufragen, reicht jedoch nicht aus. Besser ist es, Ihre Lieferanten und deren ESG-Compliance kontinuierlich zu monitoren.

Komplexität geht über Nachhaltigkeit hinaus

Supplier Management umfasst mehr als nur das Diktieren von Nachhaltigkeitszielen. Unternehmen müssen Zertifikate verwalten, Risiken überwachen und bewerten, Sanktionen beachten und, und, und. Nachhaltigkeit darf nicht isoliert betrachtet werden, sondern muss in eine umfassende Lieferantenbewertung integriert werden.

Ungünstige Lieferantenauswahl und mangelnde Entwicklung

Die Auswahl und Entwicklung von Lieferanten ist ein weiterer kritischer Punkt. Häufig fehlen klare Prozesse zur Bewertung und Weiterentwicklung. Zudem werden Lieferanten oft nur während Audits überprüft. Die Entwicklung von Lieferanten hin zu mehr Nachhaltigkeit erfordert Zeit und gezielte Maßnahmen. Daten sollten nicht nur erfasst, sondern zwischen Audits aktiv genutzt werden, um Fortschritte anzustoßen. Gleichzeitig bleiben Kommunikation und Dokumentation Schlüsselfaktoren – insbesondere bei der Lieferantennominierung.

Klare Kommunikation und Partnerschaft

Transparenz und eine offene Kommunikation sind essenziell. Setzen Sie auf eine partnerschaftliche Zusammenarbeit. Legen Sie Ihren Gespräche Daten zugrunde, um Transparenz und Vertrauen zu fördern. Vor-Ort-Besuche und gezielte Audits schaffen eine Grundlage für eine langfristige Zusammenarbeit und individuelle Verbesserungen.

Nachhaltige Lieferketten funktionieren nicht auf Knopfdruck

„Nachhaltige Beschaffung lässt sich nicht nebenbei umsetzen. Der Weg dorthin erfordert neue Strukturen und bindet kontinuierlich Ressourcen“, betont unser Supply-Chain-Experte Klaus Wiesen im Interview zu nachhaltigen Lieferketten. Das Problem: Viele Unternehmen schieben Nachhaltigkeit so lange wie möglich auf – und stehen dann kurz vor der Frist unter massivem Druck.

Praxisleitfaden für nachhaltige Lieferketten

Verschaffen Sie sich einen Überblick über alle wesentlichen Pflichten und Anforderungen. Außerdem bekommen Sie praxisnahe Tipps für nachhaltige, zukunftssichere Lieferketten.

Unsere Tipps für starkes Supplier Management

Wie meistern Sie diese Herausforderungen nun aber und schaffen das Fundament für starke Lieferantenbeziehungen? Hier sind unsere Top-Tipps für zielführendes Supplier Management – und wie es mit dem VERSO Supply Chain Hub gelingt.

Von Anfang an auf zuverlässige Lieferanten setzen

  • Etablieren Sie klare Standards für die Lieferantennominierung, z. B. Nachhaltigkeitskriterien und finanzielle Stabilität.
  • Überwachen Sie Ihre Kriterien im VERSO Supply Chain Hub kontinuierlich.

Klar kommunizieren und die Partnerschaft fördern

  • Führen Sie Gespräche datenbasiert und setzen Sie auf transparente Kommunikation.
  • Fördern Sie eine partnerschaftliche Zusammenarbeit durch regelmäßige Audits und Vor-Ort-Besuche.

Verbindliche Standards und Beschaffungspolicies etablieren

  • Entwickeln Sie – wenn noch nicht getan – verbindliche Beschaffungspolicies inkl. Nachhaltigkeitsziele, Compliance-Vorgaben und Qualitätsanforderungen. Lassen Sie diese nicht nur unterschreiben, sondern prüfen Sie sie konkret nach.
  • Überwachen Sie Einhaltung und Abweichungen mit dem VERSO Supply Chain Hub.

Lieferanten-Entwicklung aktiv fördern

  • Fördern Sie Lieferanten durch Schulungen und gemeinsame Projekte.
  • Setzen Sie Ihre Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie als festen Punkt auf die Agenda in Lieferantengesprächen.
  • Nutzen Sie Monitoring-Tools, um Fortschritte zu dokumentieren und sich das Commitment Ihrer Lieferanten einzuholen.

Daten kontinuierlich einholen

  • Erheben Sie die nötigen Daten nicht nur punktuell, sondern monitoren Sie kontinuierlich.
  • Machen Sie Ihren Lieferanten die Datenübertragung dabei so einfach wie möglich – z.b. mit standardisierten Abfragen im VERSO Supply Chain Hub.

Gezielt Tools im Supplier Management einsetzen

  • Machen Sie es sich nicht unnötig kompliziert – eine digitale Plattform erleichtert Ihnen das Datenmanagement, Monitoring und die Risikoüberwachung um ein Vielfaches.
  • Der VERSO Supply Chain Hub bietet zahlreiche Funktionen, die speziell auf Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) zugeschnitten sind.

CSRD: 10 Tipps zur Datensammlung

So sammeln Sie strategisch alle wichtigen Daten für den CSRD-Bericht.

Supplier Management als Schlüssel zur ESG-Compliance

Ein starkes Supplier Management ist der Grundstein für nachhaltige und resiliente Lieferketten. Klare Prozesse, transparente Kommunikation und der gezielte Einsatz des VERSO Supply Chain Hub ermöglichen es Unternehmen, nicht nur regulatorische Anforderungen wie die CSRD zu erfüllen, sondern auch langfristige Wettbewerbsvorteile zu sichern.

Gehen Sie von der Theorie doch am besten gleich zur Praxis über und erfahren Sie in einer kostenlosen, unverbindlichen Demo, wie VERSO Ihr Supplier Management zukunftssicher macht.

* Bei diesen Informationen handelt es sich um redaktionell zusammengefassten Content, der nicht als Rechtsberatung zu verstehen ist. VERSO übernimmt keine Haftung. 

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter!

Tragen Sie sich ein und erhalten Sie regelmäßig Neuigkeiten zu:

  • Aktuellen ESG-Themen und Gesetzesänderungen
  • Best Practices aus den Bereichen ESG und nachhaltige Lieferketten
  • News zu VERSO
  • Sustainability Events uvm.

Jetzt anmelden!

So finden Sie die richtigen Projekte zur CO2-Kompensation – ohne Greenwashing
16.10.2024

CO₂-Kompensation – how to make it work without greenwashing

What to do with unavoidable greenhouse gas emissions? In this article, you will learn how to tackle carbon offsetting – with effective projects and without greenwashing.

Your carbon footprint and climate strategy have been drawn up and you are already reducing the first greenhouse gas emissions. But it is slowly becoming clear: Despite all your efforts, you will be left with certain residual emissions! What to do with the unavoidable emissions? If you are also faced with this question, this article is for you. Because of course, CO₂ compensation is the obvious solution. But…

Careful – Carbon offsetting is a double-edged sword

Carbon offsetting has long been a contentious issue. Quite rightly so, as the situation on the carbon market is actually not so rosy: the voluntary carbon market is currently not regulated by either state supervision or a binding legal framework. Instead of legally binding criteria for the validation of carbon offsetting, there are only a number of private standards and registries with different quality criteria. This makes the market structure opaque and leads to major differences in quality within the climate protection projects on which the so-called CO₂ credits are based. One example: Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) has already successfully filed several lawsuits against offsetting through forest projects and reforestation. The reasons: The estimated forest area could not offset the amount of CO₂ emitted at all or the project did not run long enough to keep up with the lifespan of CO₂ in the atmosphere. This leaves you with two problems:

  1. You cannot rely solely on the information provided by standards and registers for quality assurance
  2. At the same time, your company is expected to report truthfully, as greenwashing is penalised.

Actually, you should now take another look at the certified projects yourself. As you can imagine: It will be time-consuming. Together with our partner ClimateGrid, we will show you how to efficiently select reputable carbon offsetting projects.

Guide to the decarbonisation strategy

A holistic decarbonisation strategy or climate strategy is more than helpful when implementing climate targets, transition plans and carbon footprints. With this guide, you can get started right away!

6 factors for the selection of serious projects for CO₂ compensation

1. Impact

The projects should have measurable positive effects on the environment that, where possible, go beyond the mere reduction of CO₂ emissions. This includes the protection of biodiversity, but also the improvement of air and water quality as well as the restoration and preservation of ecosystems (co-benefits). A strong environmental impact means that the selected project makes a holistic contribution to environmental protection.

2. Methodology and verification

The projects should be based on recognised scientific methods and standards. They should also be regularly reviewed by independent third parties to ensure the reliability of the emission reductions claimed.

3. Durability and monitoring

It is important that projects are monitored throughout their entire duration to ensure that emissions are actually reduced in the long term. Regular monitoring and reporting help to recognise risks at an early stage and take countermeasures. This ensures the long-term impact of the project.

4. Additionality

Projects are considered additional if they would not have been realised without the expected income from the proceeds of emission allowances. This requires a more detailed analysis and assessment of the initial scenario (project baseline).

5. Double counting

The project of your choice must guarantee that the emission reductions are not sold more than once or claimed by different parties. This protects the integrity of the carbon market.

6. Embedding in the climate strategy

CO₂ offsetting should really only be an option if you have already exhausted all potential for reducing emissions as part of your climate strategy. A serious project should be part of a comprehensive climate strategy and should never be considered in isolation. This ensures that the measures make a meaningful contribution to your overall climate goals and are not just used for ‘greenwashing’.

Die Green-Claims-Richtlinie auf einen Blick

Beware of greenwashing: The EU now wants to provide a clear framework for sustainability claims to ensure honesty and transparency. Get a clear overview of the new Green Claims Directive and its consequences for your company!

What you should take away from this article

If you want to offset emissions, you should therefore not choose the first offset project that comes along. Use our tips to select a project with a real impact! And remember: climate neutrality can only be achieved with close coordination between your carbon footprint, decarbonisation strategy, greenwashing awareness and reputable climate and environmental protection projects to offset your unavoidable residual emissions.

Looking for support with your CO₂ management?

As you can see, choosing the right projects for your CO₂ offsetting is not that easy. And who knows, maybe you can still reduce greenhouse gas emissions in one place or another? We would be happy to look at this with you. We will guide you through your decarbonization strategy with climate consulting and CO₂ software. And when it comes to selecting the right offsetting projects, we will help you further together with our partner ClimateGrid.

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.
Tipps & Learnings aus der EFRAG-Studie zu den ersten CSRD-Berichten
04.10.2024

EFRAG study: Learnings and tips for your CSRD report

EFRAG has analyzed some of the first ESRS sustainability reports and published the results in a comprehensive study. Here you can find the lessons learned from the study and our tips for CSRD implementation.

In 2024, some companies published their first voluntary report in accordance with the ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards). EFRAG has analyzed some of these first ESRS reports in a study.

The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) is an independent EU advisory body that promotes the development of reporting standards, particularly in the area of sustainability. She helped develop the ESRS, the standards for implementing the CSRD. The study provides companies that are dealing with sustainability reporting for the first time with learnings, best practice approaches and assistance. We have taken a look at the comprehensive document and prepared a clear overview for you.

In this article you will receive:

  • Practical approaches to ESRS implementation and their advantages and disadvantages
  • Dos & don’ts for your CSRD report
  • Our 5 top tips for a CSRD-compliant report

Webinar: How to master the double materiality analysis

In the free webinar on November 28, we will address the key requirements based on selected questions. Find out how to comply with the DWA efficiently and audit-proof!

Practical approaches to ESRS implementation and their advantages and disadvantages

EFRAG has looked at the previous reports from four perspectives:

  • How did the companies approach the double materiality analysis?
  • How were the data points selected and what was the quality of the response?
  • How detailed was the value chain depicted in the reports?
  • How were the responsibilities in ESG reporting management regulated?

The organization has observed different approaches for these four perspectives, all of which have their advantages and disadvantages. Depending on experience, data situation and organization, different approaches make sense for companies. This overview will provide you with inspiration for implementation in your company:

Topic Preliminary observed approaches Advantages Disadvantages
Double materiality analysis Based on data collection, additional involvement of stakeholders and experts Objective, evidence-based assessment of material topics Quality and efficiency can suffer if little or imprecise data is available and experts are not sufficiently involved
Based mainly on input from external stakeholders and internal participants Broader range of potentially material topics can broaden the horizon Variety of topics can be overwhelming; assessments could be subjective
Data points Evaluation of materiality at the level of individual data points (bottom-up) Preventive sorting out of immaterial data points saves work and streamlines the report to the essentials The concept of materiality at data point level (“Is this data point material for the company?”) is rarely fully understood
Use of phase-in options (omission of data points in the first or second reporting year) Companies can focus better on building the database, the correctness of the report and the structure of processes Comparability (base years etc.) not consistent and possibly misleading; concern about overlooking reporting obligations
Disclosure of all data points without using the phase-in options Ensure that no reporting obligation is overlooked High effort; not all data points may be relevant; lower data quality due to larger reporting scope
Value chain Highly segmented mapping (e.g. according to production stages) Very detailed reporting with a high level of transparency Difficult to find the balance between aggregation and granularity; industry-specific guidelines would be helpful
Rough aggregation (e.g. to total levels of upstream, downstream and own operations) Streamlines the report; an overview without detail is often sufficient for readers Can limit the assessment of IROs at the right level of detail and potentially miss nuances of complex value chains
Go beyond direct business relationships (Tier 1) High transparency; full ESRS compliance Limited data availability, especially for financial institutions; difficulties in application beyond Tier 1 relationships
Focus only on direct business relationships (Tier 1) Data is more available in this area; for some companies only Tier 1 is material Not compliant with ESRS requirements; information distortions and insufficient consideration of material effects in connection with indirect business relationships
ESG report management One person has primary responsibility; often from the sustainability or finance department There is a clear point of contact within the company Training is required to provide managers with comprehensive knowledge of ESG content management and data management
Shared responsibility between departments (e.g. finance and sustainability) Allows responsibility to be shared; skills can be pooled Requires clear governance and regular forums for updates, coordination and decision-making between the departments involved

Dos & don’ts for your CSRD report

Dos:

Structure sustainability reporting clearly: Define clear responsibilities for reporting processes, data delivery, verification, communication, etc. – similar to financial reporting. Involve internal and external experts: Conduct workshops and interviews to obtain in-depth input – especially for your material topics. Communicate the scope, objective and purpose of the report internally and externally: A common understanding of the CSRD reporting obligation promotes consistent data quality and a uniform, readable report.

Don’ts:

Avoid over-aggregating the data: If you make data, processes and descriptions too general or brief, relevant information may be lost. No purely subjective assessments: Greenwashing was yesterday – the CSRD demands evidence for your statements. Always supplement qualitative information with data-based evidence. Do not report superfluous data points: Avoid including more data points than necessary as this can distract from relevant information.

Practical guide: Fit for the first CSRD report

Our practical guide with checklist makes it easier for you to get started and prepare for the CSRD and ESRS.

Our 5 top tips for a CSRD-compliant report

  1. Establish clearly defined processes: Develop clear processes for data collection and reporting – this is the only way to ensure consistency and reliability.
  2. Organize reporting well: Establish clear responsibilities and promote cross-departmental cooperation. All departments must be involved in the implementation of the CSRD.
  3. Carry out a data gap analysis: Use the EFRAG Implementation Guidance 3 to find your gaps in data collection and close them.
  4. Consider the supply chain now: Despite the transition periods, we advise you to start working on the transparency of your supply chains now – because even with a top tool such as the Supply Chain Hub, obtaining supplier data will not happen overnight.
  5. IT integration: Get rid of the clutter of Excel lists and implement software like the VERSO ESG Hub, which is designed to collect and report on over 1,000 data points.

Overwhelmed by the CSRD?

Meet CSRD requirements with ease – with our modular CSRD Suite.

Conclusion

Our conclusion on the EFRAG study: There are different approaches to implementing the CSRD reporting obligation. However, it is becoming apparent that the requirements can only be met if

  • high data quality is available,
  • the focus is on the key topics, disclosure requirements and data points, and
  • the reportable data points are reported in a fact-based and detailed manner.

Centralized data collection and clear communication of requirements are essential for this. Sufficient time and resources should be planned for the materiality analysis. And extensive knowledge (internal and/or external) of the individual requirements is necessary for correct reporting. Do you need support with this? VERSO offers everything from a single source: software, consulting and training.

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.
10 CSRD-Tipps
23.09.2024

10 CSRD tips for
ESG managers

“CSRD – what exactly do we need to do?” Many companies are faced with this question. The scope of the reporting obligation and the associated ESRS standards is very challenging. Don’t lose your nerve right away – these 10 CSRD tips will help you get started.

The first glance at the requirements of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) can set the pulse of sustainability managers racing. The CSRD may be challenging, but that’s no reason to panic! Here are 10 CSRD tips for you if you are dealing with the European reporting obligation for the first time.

CSRD tip 1: Clarify whether ESG regulations are affected

Get an overview of the CSRD and whether your company is affected and when you have to report for the first time. Clarify whether you are or will be affected by other ESG regulations. This is because these regulations may or must be covered or taken into account in the CSRD report. The EU Taxonomy, the German Supply Chain Act (LkSG) and the European Supply Chain Directive (CSDDD) are important in this context. An overview of the CSRD can be found in the CSRD factsheet.

CSRD tip 2: Take a closer look at the ESRS reporting standard

In order to understand the scope and requirements of the CSRD for your sustainability report, it is important that you have at least a rough overview of the framework, the ESRS. Don’t worry, you don’t have to read and understand all 1000+ data points: It’s best to take a look at the structure of the ESRS report here. And if you do want to take a closer look, you can download the original version of all ESRS standards from the EFRAG website.

CSRD tip 3: Link theory with practice

There are some companies that have published a CSRD report this year. You can learn from them and get a feel for what your report could look like. However, each company is so individual that you can’t follow one of these reports exactly. Each report has done different things well. But a spoiler first: the CSRD report will probably be closer to the financial report than most previous reports according to GRI or DNK. There is currently a lot of discussion about which direction the sustainability report will take. Here you can find a study by EFRAG on some initial reports.

Course: Fit for Sustainability – Sustainability for specialists and managers

Gain a comprehensive understanding of sustainability compliance, ESG management and the implementation of sustainable transformation. Specially tailored to the needs and perspectives of specialists and managers!

CSRD tip 4: Understanding the double materiality methodology

The basis of the CSRD report is the dual materiality analysis. The materiality analysis has been around for some time, but the principle of dual materiality to identify sustainability issues relevant to reporting has only become mandatory with the CSRD. The ESRS prescribe a specific process for this, which must be documented. It is important to critically question: What is our knowledge and capacity for materiality analysis? Can we do this internally or do we need external help? Our experience shows: Bringing in external consultants is definitely helpful – if only to be able to draw on their experience when evaluating and selecting topics. No matter what you decide: We have outlined the process for the analysis here. You can also get a good overview of the method in EFRAG’s Implementation Guideline and in the DNK’s supporting documents.

Webinar: How to master the double materiality analysis

In the free webinar on November 28, we will address the key requirements based on selected questions. Find out how to comply with the DWA efficiently and audit-proof!

CSRD tip 5: Create resources and expertise for the CSRD project

CSRD is a major challenge and not a one-off project. One sustainability manager alone is often not enough. Take a realistic look at the to-dos: What resources do we need for implementation? Are additional skills or training necessary? Do we need to hire someone? In the event that know-how is not enough, you are sure to find the right training course at the VERSO Academy.

CSRD tip 6: Plan the process in detail

There are some steps in CSRD reporting that require either a lot of time, a lot of coordination with internal stakeholders or both. It is therefore important that the process is realistic and forward-looking. You should also allow for buffers and plan a little more generously. You should keep the following milestones in mind:

  • When do we want to publish the report?
  • Are there any time constraints that we need to consider (vacations, other projects?)
  • When do we write the report?
  • Who needs to be involved in the process and when?
  • When do we collect the data?
  • When do we do the dual materiality analysis?
  • When do we have to start?

The challenge of the first sustainability report

A company’s first ESG report is always particularly time-consuming.
We have created a practical guide for your first sustainability report.
You will be guided step by step through the process of creating a meaningful sustainability report.

CSRD tip 7: Determine contact persons

Reporting is a team effort: in addition to the sustainability managers, the implementation of CSRD requires the involvement of a wide range of departments within a company. Determine your contact persons from the teams at an early stage, get them on board and clarify responsibilities. We have summarized which teams are involved in CSRD, why and how in a graphic.

CSRD betrifft das ganze Unternehmen – Geschäftsführung, Stakeholder, Risikomanagement, Marketing, HR, Einkauf.

CSRD tip 8: Develop a process for data collection

You will need lots and lots of data for your CSRD-compliant sustainability report. This quickly raises the question: How do we collect the data? Establish a process that is as seamless as possible. And then: Where do we collect the data? Yes, this can be an Excel list, but experience has shown that this quickly becomes confusing. Our recommendation: use sustainability software for this.

CSRD tip 9: Take a strategic view of sustainability

The CSRD actively asks for a sustainability strategy – you need a concept for each individual key sustainability aspect. You also need to show how sustainability is anchored in the corporate strategy. Here are tips for developing a sustainability strategy.

CSRD tip 10: Don’t forget the supply chain

Although you can extend the transition period here, sooner or later you will need the data from the supply chain. And experience shows that you can’t achieve supply chain transparency overnight – it’s a longer process. Therefore: send out questionnaires now, carry out assessments and get an overview of the supply chain – preferably directly via a central tool such as the VERSO Supply Chain Hub.

Overwhelmed by the CSRD?

Make CSRD as easy as possible: Our new CSRD Suite provides tools and support for every stage of CSRD compliance.

Our bonus tips:

Finally, we have two bonus tips for you: How should the process of creating a sustainability report be optimized? The guide with 7 steps to the sustainability report will help you. And if you want to delve deeper into CSRD reporting, we have a comprehensive guide for you: CSRD practice guide.

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Trusted by 250+ customers
Blog Fahrradbranche Lieferkette
09.09.2024

Compliance in the supply chain: How the bicycle industry is mastering the task

Sustainability regulatory obligations are increasing and compliance in the supply chain is becoming ever more important. Read our article to find out how companies fullfil the ESG requirements for the supply chain and how VERSO specifically supports the bicycle industry in this task.

The economy is undergoing a profound change. More and more companies are integrating sustainability into their business models. This topic is also becoming increasingly important in the bicycle industry – especially in relation to the supply chain, as this is where the greatest risks and the greatest impact of bicycle manufacturers lie.

Two factors play a key role. Firstly, many companies are launching sustainable initiatives to improve their environmental footprint. This enables them to generate business value and Competitive advantages.

On the other hand, regulatory pressure is growing – including throughtheCSRD reporting obligation, the CO2-border-adjustment mechanism CBAM and the EUDR regulation for deforestation-free supply chains. Compliance with sustainability requirements is becoming mandatory.

CSRD, EUDR and CBAM: New requirements for compliance in the supply chain

There are numerous new requirements in the area of sustainability that also affect the bicycle industry. The CSRD, the EU directive on sustainability reporting, plays a major role. Companies have to provide extensive ESG information – and not only consider their own company, but also the supply chain. We have summarised what exactly is required in our blog post „CSRD and the supply chain”. However, the industry is also confronted with new obligations arising from the use of certain raw materials. For example, companies are subject to the EUDR because rubber is used for bicycle tyres. By using CO2-intensive materials such as aluminium or steel, companies may also be affected by CBAM. Both regulations include an assessment of certain raw materials as well as a documentation and reporting obligation. Those who create transparency here and thus address the risks identified have created the basis for fulfilling almost all requirements and compliance in the supply chain.

Compliance in the supply chain: the challenge of a complex supply chain

Cycling is – apart from walking – the most environmentally friendly form of transport: emission-free, quiet, efficient and climate-friendly. However, this only applies to pedalling. When it comes to the production of bicycles, especially e-bikes, the balance is somewhat different.

In addition to emissions – including CO2-intensive materials – the use of high-risk materials also plays a role. “Raw materials for motors, electronics and batteries are associated with major sustainability risks,” explains Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chain at VERSO. In addition, the bicycle industry often has complex supply chains. This makes it all the more important to create transparency with regard to these issues and reduce risks.

The complexity of the supply chain results from the large number of players involved in the production of the numerous components of a bicycle or e-bike. These players are distributed internationally, which results in different framework conditions and long transport routes.

Compared to conventional bicycles, e-bikes bring additional challenges. New technologies and raw materials for the drive and battery have become relevant in production. Here, bicycle manufacturers are competing with industries such as the IT sector, with which they previously had little contact.

CSRD and supply chain: these disclosures are required

The CSRD obliges companies to provide extensive information on the supply chain. Find out what information is required and what opportunities and risks arise from the EU directive.

The growing importance of transparency and data management

“Transparency in the supply chain is the key to complying with current and future regulations,” emphasises Klaus Wiesen. Many VERSO customers have voluntarily established corresponding processes before they are obliged to do so by regulations such as the Supply Chain Act (LkSG).

Riese Müller is a pioneer in the bicycle industry and aims to be the most sustainable company in the e-bike sector by 2025. With the VERSO Supply Chain Hub the company creates the necessary transparency in the supply chain and promotes its suppliers in terms of sustainability. Riese Müller is also improving risk management and supply chain mapping to ensure compliance in the supply chain.

However, not all companies in the bicycle industry are that advanced. A key problem is the collection and management of data along the supply chain. Smaller manufacturers in particular have some catching up to do.

“Many companies have hardly collected any structured data, which now presents them with considerable challenges if they want to fulfil the requirements of CSRD, CBAM, EUDR and other regulations,” says Klaus Wiesen. This is where VERSO comes in and offers solutions to support companies in realigning their processes and fulfilling the requirements.

Compliance in the supply chain: benefiting from the network

VERSO is the bicycle industry’s leading platform for sustainability in the supply chain. Their customers include German companies such as Riese Müller as well as international manufacturers – for example from the Netherlands, Switzerland and the USA.

“As there is a large overlap in the supplier base in the bicycle industry, our customers benefit from the networks created and stored in our software,” explains Klaus Wiesen. All customers also benefit from learning effects from previous projects. VERSO integrates new regulations into its software at an early stage to ensure future compliance in the supply chain.

EUDR: Everything you need to know

The EU regulation for deforestation-free supply chains (EUDR) aims to prevent the ongoing deforestation of forests. In our article, we answer the most important questions about the EUDR.

Leveraging supply chain ompliance as a chance for the bicycle industry

The regulations are not only associated with additional tasks. They also open up new opportunities for companies.

One example is risk management. Companies in the bicycle industry have suffered particularly badly from supply bottlenecks in the past. Resilience in the supply chain has therefore become an important issue. By identifying risks (e.g. political instability, natural disasters or human rights violations), a company can take measures to minimize or avoid the impact of these risks. This ensures robust supply chains.

Bicycle manufacturers’ customers often attach great importance to sustainability. Those who fulfill the compliance requirements show that their company takes responsibility for ethical and environmentally friendly standards in the supply chain. This creates trust, provides a competitive advantage and contributes to the long-term success and good reputation of the brand.

Avoiding reputational damage and penalties also plays a role. Companies that do not fulfill their regulatory obligations must expect sanctions. We have summarised possible penalties in the blog post Sanctions at a glance: The cost of mistakes in reporting and implementing sustainability” for an easy overview.

Holistic sustainability management at VERSO

In order to fulfill the requirements, companies should prepare for the new regulations at an early stage. Thanks to our expertise in the bicycle industry (among others) VERSO is the ideal partner. “With the VERSO Supply Chain Hub we have been supporting our customers for years with transparency in the supply chain and the fulfillment of their due diligence obligations. Our software solution enables optimized preparation for current and future regulations,’ emphasizes Klaus Wiesen.

The supply chain harbors the greatest risks and has the greatest impact in the bicycle industry. However, a holistic view of a company is necessary, particularly with regard to CSRD. This includes the upstream and downstream value chain as well as the company’s own business activities. VERSO offers an all-in-one solution here.

With the VERSO ESG Hub you can collect all relevant data and create a meaningful sustainability report. With the Climate Hub the corporate carbon footprint is calculated and a climate strategy is mapped. The VERSO sustainability experts will support you throughout the entire process. Furthermore, you can gain additional know-how about sustainability in our VERSO Academy courses.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Trusted by 250+ customers
Die Geschichte des Nachhaltigkeitsberichts beginnt in den 1980er Jahren – damals gab es die ersten freiwilligen Umweltberichte. Seitdem hat sich enorm viel getan – bis hin zu einer Berichtspflicht.
20.08.2024

The history of the sustainability report: how it has evolved

The history of the sustainability report begins in the 1980s, when the first voluntary environmental reports were published. A lot has happened since then – right up to mandatory reporting. Read about the milestones and drivers that have shaped the ESG report and how the reports have developed in terms of depth and quality.

History of the sustainability report from 1980-2000: The era of environmental reports

The history of the sustainability report goes back to the 1980s.
But for the introduction to this blog article, let’s go back a little further.
This will help us to understand why the topic of sustainability and ESG suddenly became so popular.
Let’s transport ourselves back to the early 1970s, so to speak.
The world was characterized by rapid change and far-reaching social, economic and political developments.
The Cold War dominated international politics.
The oil crisis made people aware of their dependence on fossil fuels and their finite nature.
Economic growth and industrialization continued.
At the same time, however, environmental conditions deteriorated, for example due to polluted air and water.
It was precisely at this time that a book was published that attracted worldwide attention.
The title: “The Limits to Growth”.
It was published by the Club of Rome, an association of scientists, economists, business people and former politicians.
This was a turning point.
The Club of Rome played a central role in ensuring that the issues of environmental awareness and sustainability were recognized globally for the first time.
But here we need to put the brakes on: not everything changed immediately.
Awareness was only gradually followed by action.
But there have already been the first Forerunner of the sustainability report.
In the 1980s, chemical companies published so-called environmental reports on their environmental activities.
These were voluntary and mainly served to improve their image, as the industry was subject to strong criticism.
In the 1990s, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) followed suit and became involved in environmental issues.

However, the reports of the time were still a decade away from the holistic approach of today’s sustainability reports.
Only then did the consideration of all ESG aspects – i.e. environmental, social and corporate governance – become established.
Before we continue our journey through time, let’s take a look at a few highlights from the years of environmental reports:

  • 1979: The first world climate conference under the auspices of the UN takes place in Geneva.
  • End of 1980: Many chemical companies publish environmental reports.
  • Early 1990: Some small and medium-sized companies follow suit and also publish environmental reports for marketing purposes.
  • 1995: With the introduction of EMAS, more and more environmental declarations are drawn up (equivalent to environmental reports).

The challenge of the first sustainability report

A company’s first ESG report is always particularly time-consuming.
We have created a practical guide for your first sustainability report.
You will be guided step by step through the process of creating a meaningful sustainability report.

History of the sustainability report from 2000-2010: Major corporations report

Our journey through the history of sustainability reporting continues with the turn of the millennium.
Compared to today, the attention paid to sustainability and ESG was manageable.
But there were important developments that brought it into the national and international spotlight.
The Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997 and came into force in 2005.
It was the first international agreement to set binding targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
In 2002, Germany, like other countries, adopted a “National Sustainability Strategy”. In addition to public interest, new technologies also gave the topic of sustainability a boost.
At the turn of the millennium, wind power became the most important of all renewable energies.
Ten years later, it was replaced at the top by solar energy.
The overall advance of all renewable energies was unstoppable.
While the topic of sustainability itself gained in importance, this did not yet have a major impact on ESG reporting.
Until 2010, it was mainly large companies that published a voluntary sustainability report – they recognized the increasing attention for the topic.
However, two events provided a significant impetus here.
The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) published its first guidelines.
They provided companies with a framework for reporting on environmental, social and economic aspects.
Over the years, the guidelines were further developed into the GRI Standards (from 2016).
The topic of sustainable finance also emerged.
Special indices were created with companies that act more sustainably.
Before the history of sustainability reports really picks up speed, let’s take a look at the most important milestones from this period:

  • 1999: The GRI guidelines are published, at the same time the topic of sustainable finance gains in importance.
    The era of environmental reports is over and social and economic aspects are increasingly included in sustainability reports.
  • 2000: The non-profit organization Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) is founded.
    Its aim is for companies to publish environmental data such as greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption, and it now manages the largest database of its kind in the world.
  • 2003: The first statutory reporting obligation in Europe comes into force with the EU Modernization Directive.

History of the sustainability report from 2014-2019: boom in frameworks

A veritable boom in ESG reporting regulations began in 2010.
This was accompanied by the development of numerous reporting standards and frameworks that offered companies a standardized method for disclosing sustainability aspects.
As a result, reports became more standardized and clearer and transparency increased.
A holistic view of sustainability was anchored in the standards.
Typically, the environmental aspects were CO2 emissions, energy consumption and waste.
Social aspects included working conditions, human rights and communities.
Governance covered topics such as corporate management and ethical business practices.
Companies began to define and measure their sustainability goals and progress more clearly.
Many companies realized that sustainable practices are not only good for their image.
They can also bring economic benefits, such as cost savings, risk reduction and an improved competitive position.
You can read about the business value that sustainability can bring in the blog post“Why is sustainability important for companies?”. As this decade draws to a close, we would also like to look at a few highlights.
This time it’s about important frameworks and regulations:

  • 2014: The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive NFRD (predecessor of the CSRD) and its German implementation law CSR-RUG (followed in 2017) come into force.
    This means that large listed companies with certain criteria, such as over 500 employees, are required to report.
  • 2016: The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, the 17 SDGs, come into force and have been a popular framework for reports ever since.
  • 2017: The TCFD framework is published.
    It provides good recommendations for reporting on the effects of climate change, particularly for the financial sector and capital market-oriented companies.
  • 2018: Another framework: the SASB standards.
    Today, they are part of the ISSB, which creates standards for global comparability.

By the way: If you need an overview of standards and frameworks, take a look at our factsheet.

CSRD beyond bureaucracy: potential and opportunities

Even if the CSRD is primarily a bureaucratic obligation and entails many requirements, it also conceals valuable opportunities for business.
Read our blog article to find out what these are.

History of the 2019-2024 Sustainability Report: The EU and the Green Deal

The story of the sustainability report is now slowly coming to an end.
But only in this blog post.
A lot will certainly happen in this area in the coming years.
However, we don’t want to speculate, but rather take a closer look at what has happened since 2019.
The initial situation: there was a reporting obligation.
However, this only affected around 500 companies in Germany.
Companies had some freedom in the information they provided.
The main criticism was the poor comparability.
The new approach: With its Green Deal, the EU not only wanted to optimize and standardize ESG reporting, but also drive forward the entire sustainable transformation of the economy.
The central goal: Europe will be the first climate-neutral continent by 2050.
In order to implement this ambitious plan, the EU has put together a comprehensive package of directives and measures.
These included, for example, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Supply Chain Directive (CSDD).
As part of the CSRD reporting obligation, a standardized European framework, the ESRS, was even developed for the first time, which provides companies with clear guidelines regarding content and form.
Here is an overview of important regulations from recent years:

  • 2019: The EU Green Deal is adopted.
  • 2020: The EU taxonomy applies and defines which economic activities can be classified as sustainable.
  • 2022: The CSRD is adopted and gradually increases the number of companies subject to reporting requirements from 2024 to around 50,000 in Europe and around 15,000 in Germany.
  • 2023: The German Supply Chain Act LkSG comes into force and requires companies to submit a report on sustainability in their supply chain.
  • 2024: The European supply chain law CSDDD is passed.
    The reports are to be submitted together with the CSRD report, thus further expanding the content of the sustainability reports.
1980-2000: Die Ära der Umweltberichte
Bis 2010 haben dann hauptsächlich große Unternehmen berichtet, die bereits einen zunehmend Druck, sich des Themas Nachhaltigkeit langsam anzunehmen, verspürt haben. Daran war besonders stark die Global Reporting Initiative und das Aufkommen des Themas Sustainable Finance beteiligt. Die wichtigsten Meilensteine aus der Zeit:

1999: Die GRI-Leitlinien werden veröffentlicht, zeitgleich gewinnt das Thema Sustainable Finance an Bedeutung. Die Ära der Umweltberichte ist damit vorbei und es fließen zunehmend soziale und ökonomische Aspekte in die Nachhaltigkeitsberichte ein.
2000: Die Non-Profit-Organisation Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) wird gegründet. Sie hat das Ziel, dass u.a. Unternehmen Umweltdaten wie THG-Emissionen sowie Wasserverbrauch veröffentlichen, und verwaltet inzwischen die größte Datenbank dieser Art weltweit.
2003: Mit der EU-Modernisierungs-Richtlinie tritt die erste gesetzliche Berichtspflicht in Europa
in Kraft.
Seit 2010 gibt es einen regelrechten Boom an Regularien, die Unternehmen dazu veranlassen, über Nachhaltigkeit in all ihren Aspekten zu berichten. Mit den Regularien wurden auch zahlreiche Standards und Frameworks entwickelt, die Unternehmen bei dem Projekt Nachhaltigkeitsbericht helfen. Wir haben einige wichtige Frameworks und Regularien herausgegriffen:

2014: Die EU-Richtlinie zur nicht- finanziellen Berichterstattung NFRD (Vorgänger der CSRD) und ihr deutsches Umsetzungsgesetz CSR-RUG gelten. Damit werden große börsennotierte Unternehmen mit bestimmten Kriterien, wie etwa data-lazy-src=

    Subscribe to our newsletter!

    Sign up and receive regular news about:

    • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
    • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
    • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
    • Trusted by 250+ customers
    Sonnenstrahlen brechen durch Wolken hindurch – Symbolbild für die Chancen, die die CSRD bringt, auch wenn sie erst einmal wie belastende Bürokratie wirkt
    07.08.2024

    Why the CSRD is more than bureaucracy

    Despite the many requirements, working on the CSRD report creates a profound awareness of genuine sustainability. Even if the CSRD is primarily a bureaucratic obligation, it also conceals valuable opportunities for business. Read this article to find out what these are.

    The first companies have already published their CSRD report, and many more have yet to do so.
    In Germany alone, around 15,000 companies are affected by the new EU directive on sustainability reporting.
    And if we look a little further: Across Europe, a total of around 50,000 companies will have to report in accordance with the CSRD in the coming years.

    What is the aim of the CSRD?

    The CSRD is primarily intended to improve the transparency and comparability of sustainability reports, but also to close gaps in previous reporting obligations.
    To understand this, it helps to look back at the past of sustainability reporting.
    Sustainability reporting used to be voluntary for companies, was subject to no or only a few rules and often ended up as a kind of marketing brochure.
    The first EU directives then put a stop to this.
    However, the CSRD now goes one step further.
    On the one hand, a whole host of companies are affected by the new reporting obligation, from small and medium-sized enterprises to large corporations.
    Across Europe.
    And in some cases even beyond the EU.
    On the other hand, there are stricter rules: All disclosures must now be verifiable and signed off by auditors. The CSRD also requires significantly more and more in-depth quantitative and qualitative data.
    This should make the reports more comparable.
    In this way, the EU wants to drive forward the sustainable transformation of the economy.
    At the same time, the CSRD is a sensible response to the growing expectations of investors, customers and society as a whole.
    Companies are increasingly being held accountable for their sustainability performance – and more and more often, sustainability efforts also form the basis for economic success.
    In a nutshell: CSRD makes sustainability transparent and comparable, creating the basis for us to steer our economy towards a more sustainable future in a targeted manner.
    “That sounds all well and good,” you may be thinking, “but what’s the point of all the pink clouds if I’m sitting here at my desk and can’t see sustainability for all the data?”

    Overwhelmed by the CSRD?

    Make CSRD as easy as possible: Our new CSRD Suite provides tools and support for every stage of CSRD compliance.

    Awareness arises from bureaucracy

    PwC recently published a study according to which the majority of the companies surveyed were confident: Yes, we will be ready for our new reporting obligations by the deadline. The respondents were mainly listed companies with an annual turnover of over one billion. However, we know from our own experience that small and medium-sized enterprises in particular are groaning in the face of the work involved in preparing and implementing the CSRD. They tend to have mixed feelings about the CSRD. “The CSRD is just another useless bureaucracy that will create a burden, stress and work and tie up considerable resources, but ultimately won’t change anything at all.” This and similar criticism of the new directive is often voiced. And yes – of course there is a lot of bureaucracy behind the new laws and reporting obligations relating to sustainability. A lot of data has to be collected, a lot of time is spent on preparation and implementation and a lot of employees are involved. However, in our work with our customers, we see time and again that anyone who writes sustainability reports and takes an in-depth look at the topic of sustainability also recognizes the potential of CSRD.

    Practical guide: Fit for the first CSRD report

    Our practical guide with checklist makes it easier for you to get started and prepare for the CSRD and ESRS.

    More than just a bureaucracy monster: 6 potentials of CSRD for your company

    Despite (or perhaps because of!) the many requirements, working on the CSRD report creates a profound awareness of genuine sustainability.
    So even if the CSRD is primarily a bureaucratic obligation, it conceals valuable insights and potential.
    And let’s take a look at them now.

    1. the CSRD promotes a better understanding of one’s own risks and opportunities

    Before the actual CSRD report is prepared, the double materiality analysis is carried out. Here you determine:

    • How do sustainability aspects influence your company?
    • What impact does my company have on the environment and society?

    Background: The ESRS, the CSRD framework, lists over 1,000 possible data points for the report. In the end, however, only selected data points such as ESRS 2 and those whose associated impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) you have determined to be material are required to be reported. On the one hand, the double materiality analysis gives you clarity as to what belongs in your CSRD report. On the other hand, it also gives you a very helpful picture of how your company relates to the environment and society. You also get a crystal-clear overview of the risks your company could still face – where undiscovered opportunities for the future of your company lie dormant – and how your company is developing. Find out more in our article “The double materiality analysis in 7 steps”.

    The ESRS standards at a glance

    With the CSRD, the EU is also introducing uniform European standards.
    The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) are intended to make sustainability reports more meaningful and comparable.
    All information can be found in the whitepaper.

    2. the CSRD brings economic benefits, supports innovation …

    The majority of decision-makers surveyed in a Noerr study assume that ESG will bring about change in the company. However, the transformation of business models in turn requires comprehensive adjustments to product development, internal processes and management. This is where the wealth of data you collect and analyze for CSRD provides useful insights. Where are resources still being wasted without this being noticed? Which processes that “we’ve always done this way” could be optimized – and thus promote not only sustainability but also efficiency? Where do we need to rethink in order for the sustainable transformation to succeed? These are just a few situations in which ESG data management lays the foundation for a sustainable future. In the best case scenario, you don’t just write your CSRD report for the sake of it, but take something away from it for the success of your company.

    3. … and strengthens the resilience of your company

    Let’s take a concrete example: ESRS E1, the “climate change standard”. Here you have to report, among other things,

    • how your company has a positive and negative impact on the climate,
    • which climate protection measures you implement,
    • what risks and opportunities arise from climate change,
    • and how to adapt your company to climate change.

    The smaller the company, the greater the likelihood that the issue of climate change will not necessarily be a high priority due to time constraints – i.e. it will be postponed for the time being without the CSRD. However, the first consequences of climate change are already making themselves felt. And will occur more frequently in the future. Heavy rain, floods, heatwaves, droughts and fires can paralyze production facilities, lead to staff absences, cause supply chain delays or destroy transport routes. 55% of managers surveyed in Germany in a Capgemini study estimate that climate change will cause the majority of operational disruptions in the coming years. So it only makes sense to look at what climate change means for your company and how you can counteract it. And in the course of CSRD, you approach such and similar considerations in a very structured way.

    CSRD: 10 tips for successful data collection

    CSRD presents companies with new challenges – and this starts with data collection. Our article gives you 10 tips for efficient processes.

    4. solid sustainability reports create trust

    Investors and other stakeholders are now looking very closely at what is happening in your company in terms of sustainability. Sustainability reports are a great way to communicate your status quo and your ambitions in this area. The best way to do this, however, is with a reporting standard that specifies uniform requirements for all companies concerned in order to ensure maximum comparability. As we wrote at the beginning, CSRD transforms sustainability reports into transparent and, above all, verifiable documentation of your sustainability journey. And if we want to look at things from a negative perspective: Intentional and grossly negligent errors in the CSRD report are punishable by, among other things, “naming and shaming” – i.e. public disclosure. If your company violates its CSRD reporting obligations or attempts to falsify data, this can ruin its reputation and trust. In this respect too, it is therefore worth seeing the CSRD as an opportunity and implementing it conscientiously. You can find more information on the possible sanctions in our article “The cost of mistakes in reporting and implementing sustainability.”

    5 The CSRD report as a repository for fact-based sustainability communication

    Once you have identified stakeholders, determined opportunities and risks, set up strategies and collected ESG data from all possible areas as part of your CSRD obligation, you have one thing in addition to the report: a very useful repository of information. This, in turn, is ideal for any sustainability communication outside of the report. After all, this is also becoming increasingly important. Here we would like to quote a Capgemini survey once again: 77% of consumers surveyed are changing their purchasing behavior in favor of more sustainability. 66% are even specifically looking for sustainable products. Conversely, 36% of the companies surveyed also stated that Our customers are not interested in sustainability! This shows a major perception gap that needs to be closed. The best way to do this is with comparable reports that are checked by a third party (you guessed it: the CSRD…). This is what 34% of consumers surveyed in a Deloitte study would like. Fact-based sustainability communication is also beneficial when it comes to recruiting talent and employee satisfaction. According to the EIB Climate Survey 2023, 56% of people surveyed value an employer that thinks and acts sustainably. According to a Gartner survey, a strong ESG culture even boosts employee engagement by up to 43%.

    6 ESG data facilitates access to credit

    It’s not just investors and the public who are demanding ESG measures, but also banks and credit institutions. Just as a disability insurer is interested in whether you prefer to solve crossword puzzles or skydive in your free time when taking out insurance, financial institutions are now increasingly looking at ESG risks when granting loans. The list of questions is based on the CSRD, among other things. This means that if you are already collecting ESG data for the CSRD anyway, you will have it to hand more quickly when applying for financing. Read more about this in our article “ESG in financing: This data decides on loans”.

    Conclusion: CSRD is worthwhile in many respects – and it doesn’t have to be complicated at all

    Let’s summarize once again.
    CSRD helps you to identify risks and opportunities for your company in a targeted manner.
    It provides your company with economic advantages and can even become a driver of innovation.
    Furthermore, it strengthens your company’s resilience in the long term if you take a close look at sustainability.
    Externally, CSRD promotes the trust of your stakeholders and serves as a basis for general sustainability communication, which in turn appeals to customers and employees.
    Last but not least, the data once collected will help in future when granting loans.
    It’s exciting to see the wide-ranging effects of this report, which seems so dry at first, isn’t it?
    And the best thing is that CSRD doesn’t necessarily have to be a nerve-wracking challenge.
    With software and advice at eye level, VERSO will guide you step by step through the CSRD process.
    For example, with our new AI-supported module for audit-proof double materiality analysis.
    Or with our all-in-one solution for ESG management and ESG reporting – including carbon footprint and supply chain transparency.
    Feel free to contact us!

    * This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

    Subscribe to our newsletter!

    Register now to arrange a free demo appointment and get to know our solutions at first hand.

    • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
    • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
    • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
    • Trusted by 250+ customers