Author: Katja Büttner

EU-Flaggen: Die EU hat zur Umsetzung des Green Deal drei wichtige Richtlinien in Kraft gesetzt
21.08.2023

The EU ESG guidelines and how they relate to each other

The European Union’s Green Deal

With its Green Deal, the European Union wants to make the EU climate-neutral by 2050 and channel financial flows into sustainable projects and companies.
The extensive program also includes three important ESG guidelines and regulations for sustainability reporting:

  • EU taxonomy,
  • Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and
  • Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

But how are they connected and why are all three important for companies?

EU taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR briefly explained

Before we take a closer look at the relationship between the EU taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR, we will first look at the three EU requirements individually.
The European Union adopted the EU Green Deal back in 2019.
The program provides for extensive measures that penetrate deep into the economy and industry.
This also includes the three directives.

Der European Green Deal im Überblick

EU taxonomy

The EU taxonomy came into force on January 1, 2022 and defines which economic activities can be classified as sustainable.
The regulation sets out criteria for climate and environmentally friendly activities and products.
Accordingly, an economic activity must

  • make a substantial contribution to at least one of the six environmental goals,
  • do not compromise one or more of the other environmental objectives, and
  • in compliance with the minimum protection (OECD Guidelines).

Further information can be found in our factsheet on the EU taxonomy.

Factsheet: EU taxonomy

CSRD

While the EU taxonomy focuses on activities and products, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive focuses on the company level.
The CSRD will be introduced in stages from 2024 and regulates sustainability reporting by companies.
Ultimately, around 15,000 companies in Germany and around 50,000 in the EU will be affected by the directive.
The CSRD creates a uniform framework for the disclosure of ESG (environmental, social and governance) data.
In this context, there is a binding reporting standard in the European Union for the first time: the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).
Further information can be found in our factsheet on the CSRD.

Factsheet: CSRD

SFDR

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation came into force on March 10, 2021.
It obliges financial market participants such as private equity, venture capital and fund companies as well as financial advisors to disclose sustainability information on their products and portfolios.
The increased transparency is intended to ensure that environmental and social factors are given greater consideration when making investment and financing decisions.
A commitment to “sustainable finance”, so to speak.
Further information can be found in our factsheet on the SFDR.

Factsheet: SFDR

The relationship between the EU taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR

Transparency is crucial to channeling more money into sustainable projects and companies.
Customers, employees, investors and many other individuals and groups demand detailed information on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.
The interaction between the EU Taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR sets the framework for the disclosure of sustainability aspects.
The mutual relationships between the EU Taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR can be clearly seen in our illustration.
As you can see, the three sets of rules are closely interrelated and even overlap in terms of content.
First of all, the EU Taxonomy provides a classification system for sustainable economic activities, which is applied within the framework of the CSRD and SFRD.

Zusammenhang von CSRD, SFDR und EU-Taxonomie

How do I create a sustainability report?

Creating a meaningful sustainability report can be quite a challenge.
It’s easier with our playbook “7 steps to a sustainability report”.

Download Playbook

The CSRD obliges companies to report on various ESG aspects.
Affected companies must also provide information on three key indicators of the EU taxonomy – namely the proportion of taxonomy-eligible economic activities

  • of total sales
  • in capital expenditure (CapEx) and
  • operating expenses (OpEx).

The EU taxonomy and CSRD also play a role in the SFDR.
Financial market participants and financial advisors must report on key figures from the EU taxonomy for their ESG financial products that promote environmental or social characteristics or have a completely sustainable investment objective.
This requires information on the proportion of a financial product that invests in taxonomy-compliant activities.
For example, information is requested on greenhouse gas emissions, consumption and production of non-renewable energy, wage differences and gender diversity.
The financial service providers in turn obtain this sustainability-related information from the CSRD reports of the companies in which they invest.
However, there is currently a certain amount of tension.
The CSRD, i.e. the obligation to prepare a sustainability report, does not yet apply to many companies.
It will be introduced in stages from 2024.
The group of companies subject to reporting requirements will only gradually expand from 2025.
However, due to the SFDR, many companies already have to report sustainability information to financial market participants if they require a loan or investment.
It is therefore clear that it is worthwhile for companies to start reporting and collecting data at an early stage.

The most important sustainability standards

The factsheet on the most important standards gives you an overview of what is suitable for your company now – quickly and reliably.

Download factsheet

Why is sustainability important for companies?

There are numerous reasons to make a company more sustainable.
Firstly, there is growing pressure from outside – from regulatory requirements, for example, but also from customers, business partners and competitors.
But current and potential employees are also paying more attention to how their (future) employer acts and whether this is compatible with their views.

Sustainability can therefore provide a competitive advantage, strengthen the brand, increase employee motivation, retain customers and create new jobs, among other things.
As we have seen above, it also helps in the search for investors.
And, of course, a company makes a contribution to protecting our planet.
You can find numerous studies that prove this in the blog post“Why is sustainability important for companies?”.

We support you with the ESG report

You should therefore start collecting the relevant sustainability information in your company at an early stage.
You can save yourself a lot of time and effort by using specialized sustainability software such as the VERSO ESG Hub.
Our sustainability experts will also support you throughout the entire reporting process – from the materiality analysis, strategy and carbon footprint to the final reporting.
You can also acquire the knowledge you need for reporting at the VERSO Academy

Please write to us. We can help you.

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

This might also interest you:

Der Aufbau der ESRS: SO berichten Sie CSRD-konform.
28.11.2024

ESRS report structure: How to report in compliance with CSRD

Read article
Bankgebäude in Frankfurt: Zukünftig fließt das ESG-Commitment in Kreditentscheidungen ein
03.11.2023

ESG in financing: This data decides on loans

Read article

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Best practices in the areas of ESG and sustainable supply chains
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Sustainability events and much more.

Get to know the software!

Mann sitzt nachdenklich am Laptop – die Risikoanalyse für das LkSG ist mit vielen Fragen verbunden
11.01.2023

Kickstart LkSG – This is what matters

The LkSG came into force on January 1, 2023. We have summarized the current information on the law for you.

The much-discussed Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) came into force for companies on January 1, 2023.
In addition to clarifying some basic questions in order to prepare for the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, it is important to stay informed about important innovations.
We have summarized the latest information on the law.  

Important deadlines for compliance with the law

By when must the due diligence obligations be fulfilled?

Companies that have been subject to the Supply Chain Act since January 1, 2023 do not yet have to have fully complied with all due diligence obligations.
Only the responsibility for monitoring risk management must already be defined and the complaints mechanism established.
All other obligations only need to be implemented in the course of the first audit year.
If your company has fewer than 3,000 and more than 1,000 employees at German locations, it will not be subject to the law until January 1, 2024.

When does the reporting obligation apply?

The following applies to all reports that are to be submitted to the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA) and published on the company’s website between January 1, 2023 and June 1, 2024: BAFA will not verify the submission of the reports to BAFA and their publication until the deadline of January 1, 2025.
Further information and detailed answers can be obtained from the BMAS.

Practical guide to LkSG compliance

How to implement the risk analysis according to the LkSG efficiently and legally compliant – in 6 steps.

Download guide

How should the term “appropriateness” be interpreted?

In addition, the BAFA has explained the principle of appropriateness stipulated by the Supply Chain Act in more detail in a new guidance document.
According to this, companies are generally obliged to observe due diligence obligations within their supply chains in a manner that is appropriate (for them) in order to prevent, minimize or eliminate human rights or environmental risks.
The aim of this is to give each company the necessary discretion and room for maneuver with regard to the implementation of due diligence obligations.
According to the LkSG, companies do not have to guarantee that their entire supply chain is completely free of human rights violations or environmental damage.
Rather, they must ensure that they take appropriate measures according to their individual business activities to identify and address potential risks.
The due diligence obligations of the LkSG therefore establish a duty of care for companies.
However, should a breach occur in the domestic business area, remedial action must be taken immediately.
The duty of care alone is not sufficient here.  

What is the assessment of appropriateness based on?

According to LkSG § 3 para.
2, the appropriateness of an action that complies with the duty of care is based on the following criteria:

  1. Nature and scope of the company’s business activities
  2. The company’s ability to influence the direct perpetrator of a human rights or environmental risk or the violation of a human rights or environmental obligation
  3. Typical expected severity of the violation, the reversibility of the violation and the likelihood of a violation of a human rights-related or environmental obligation
  4. Nature of the company’s causal contribution to the human rights or environmental risk or to the violation of a human rights or environmental obligation

There is no fixed order for these appropriateness criteria.
Instead, companies must decide on an ongoing basis how and in what order to address them, based on their individual risks and violations.
The principle of appropriateness is closely linked to that of effectiveness.
Accordingly, companies may only make an appropriate selection from effective measures.  

How is the vulnerability risk assessed?

In principle, the more susceptible a company’s business activities or supply chain structure is to human rights or environmental risks, the greater the efforts that can be expected of this company to prevent, stop or minimize these violations.
The factors listed below serve as examples for assessing the respective vulnerability risk:

  • Activities in or procurement from risky countries
  • Activity in or affiliation to a risky sector
  • Contact with conflict minerals
  • Use of hazardous machinery and/or chemicals
  • High proportion of low-skilled, manual work

 

What needs to be considered in the risk analysis?

In addition, companies are obliged to carry out an appropriate risk analysis.
In this case, the criteria of appropriateness control the varying intensity of the investigative efforts.
Here, too, it can be generally said that a correspondingly more intensive risk assessment must be carried out for high-risk suppliers.
It is, of course, inadmissible to limit the risk analysis only to players over whom there is direct influence.
You can find out more about risk analysis in our practical guide LkSG Compliance.
Would you like to find out more? Get in touch with us.  

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

This might also interest you:

Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO
05.01.2023

The importance and future of sustainable supply chains: Interview with Klaus Wiesen

Read article
In 10 Schritten auf das Lieferkettengesetz vorbereiten
30.09.2022

Prepare for the Supply Chain Act in 10 steps

Read article

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Best practices in the areas of ESG and sustainable supply chains
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Sustainability events and much more.

Get to know the software!

Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO
05.01.2023

The importance and future of sustainable supply chains: Interview with Klaus Wiesen

In this interview, Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chain at VERSO, answers relevant questions on the challenges and solutions for more sustainability in supply chains and the role of the supply chain in the future viability of companies.

Companies currently have to deal with several requirements. In addition to the German Supply Chain Act, the CSRD, which has been in force since 2024, is on the table, while CBAM and EUDR also pose new challenges. The CSDDD is on the horizon. In this interview, Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chain at VERSO, answers relevant questions on the challenges and solutions for more sustainability in supply chains, the role of the supply chain in the future viability of companies and how the VERSO Supply Chain Hub supports the implementation of sustainability requirements and legal requirements such as the LkSG or the CSRD now and in the future.  

7 questions for Klaus Wiesen on challenges and opportunities in the supply chain

1. Why is the supply chain so important for protecting the climate and human rights?

On average, more than 80 per cent of CO2 emissions in the value chain come from the supply chain. The supply chain also plays a key role when it comes to respecting human rights and protecting biodiversity. Sustainable companies and sustainable products are only possible with a sustainable supply chain – which makes the supply chain a decisive factor for the future viability of companies.

2. What obligations do companies face with regard to their supply chains now and in the future?

The obligations are extensive. A lot has happened in terms of regulation. For example, the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) requires companies to report extensively on their commitment to sustainability, with the supply chain forming an important part of the reporting. In addition, the member states have agreed on the EU Supply Chain Act (European Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence) and the EU law to stop deforestation has been passed. Last but not least, the German Supply Chain Act, the “Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz” (LkSG), came into force on January 1, 2023. All of this ensures that companies are required to procure in a way that takes climate neutrality, environmental protection and respect for human rights fully into account. The biggest challenge for companies in fulfilling the upcoming obligations is that a supply chain cannot be made sustainable in the blink of an eye. The transition to a sustainable supply chain takes time. Accordingly, sustainable procurement cannot be achieved in a one-off project, but the path to it requires new structures within the company and continuously ties up resources. It is important that companies start early enough. Due to the current crises, however, the opposite is often the case: the issue of sustainability is put off for as long as possible. This will backfire on companies later on.

3. What are the most important steps in achieving sustainable procurement and which departments should be involved?

In purely organisational terms, purchasing should always be involved with a central function, especially as purchasing typically maintains the most intensive contact with suppliers. It is therefore important to build up sustainability expertise in purchasing – in addition to close coordination with the CSR department, if this already exists in the company. For procurement, this is an opportunity to reposition itself strategically within the company.
Transparency is also required in the supply chain: where are the suppliers’ production sites located and who is the right contact person for sustainability at suppliers? Which sustainability standards do the suppliers fulfil? And do their own suppliers in turn purchase from sustainable sources? In most cases, companies do not have the answers today.

4. How can such transparency be achieved across the supply chain?

One key to transparency is co-operation with suppliers. It is no longer just information on price or quality that needs to be obtained from suppliers. Sustainability information is also required. And not just one-off information on how risky suppliers are. A continuous assessment and development of suppliers in terms of sustainability is required. Many companies shy away from the effort involved in collecting data – for fear of high costs and negative reactions from suppliers. At VERSO, however, we see every day that the effort involved in collecting data via our cloud platform is minimal – both for our customers and for suppliers – and the feedback from suppliers is positive.

5. How does VERSO support data collection along the supply chain?

VERSO provides support at various levels: In view of the many regulatory requirements, it is very challenging for companies to define the scope of the required information. In addition, the requirements are dynamic and new laws and standards are constantly being added. Sustainability standards are currently still in their infancy. The scope of the data query must therefore be continuously supplemented or adapted. The VERSO Supply Chain Hub receives standardized self-disclosures on all relevant sustainability requirements. The questionnaires are sent automatically, data is collected and evaluated. In addition to information on which sustainability requirements a company fulfills, VERSO also helps to create transparency in the upstream supply chain. This is where the risks are sometimes greatest. If the company procures high-risk raw materials, it is essential to create transparency for the supply chains of the raw materials.

6. What opportunities does sustainable supply chain management offer, even if your own company is not affected by the LkSG?

First of all, companies that are not covered by the LkSG will most likely have to fulfil reporting obligations in accordance with the CSRD, which also applies to capital market-oriented SMEs. And the European Supply Chain Act also applies to more companies than the LkSG. But regardless of whether companies are affected by regulation or not, there are many reasons for sustainable supply chain management: I currently see the greatest opportunity in differentiating ourselves from the competition – precisely because corporate customers and consumers are paying more attention to this. In addition, the crisis has shown that companies with sustainable procurement are more resilient, meaning they have had fewer supply disruptions. And with rising CO2 prices and the planned ‘Carbon Border Tax’ (CBAM), companies that are already implementing climate targets for the supply chain will be affected by significantly lower cost increases.

7. To what extent can companies position themselves for the future with VERSO when it comes to sustainability requirements in the supply chain?

Our promise to our customers is that all sustainability requirements for the supply chain can be covered with VERSO now and in the future. The VERSO Supply Chain Hub already covers the topic of due diligence as required by the LkSG as well as climate protection and the recording of CO2 footprints, biodiversity or simply the question of where certain raw materials come from. The platform therefore offers the ideal starting point for meeting the reporting requirements of the CSRD, the EU Supply Chain Act or the EU law to stop deforestation. And, of course, to go beyond regulatory requirements and differentiate yourself from the competition.

Practical guide LkSG Compliance

Find out how to implement the risk analysis in accordance with the LkSG efficiently and in line with legal requirements.

To the guide

This might also interest you:

Containerschiff als Symbolbild für Lieferketten
30.08.2021

Erklärung für das Lieferkettengesetz: Was Unternehmen beachten müssen

Read article

Riese & Müller: supply chain transparency with VERSO

Read story

Sign up to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Trusted by 250+ customers

Get to know the software!

Risikoanalyse nach LkSG: Das sagt das BAFA – Symbolbild von Frachtcontainern
11.10.2022

LkSG-Risikoanalyse – Was sagt die BAFA-Handreichung?

„Risiken ermitteln, gewichten und priorisieren – Handreichung zur Umsetzung einer Risikoanalyse nach den Vorgaben des Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetzes“, so lautet der Titel der sehnlichst erwarteten Handreichung des Bundesamtes für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA). Im Fokus der Handreichung steht die Risikoanalyse der menschenrechtlichen und umweltbezogen Risiken im eigenen Geschäftsbereich und in der Lieferkette.

Abstrakte, konkrete und anlassbezogene Risikoanalyse

Nach dem LkSG müssen Unternehmen nach § 4 LkSG ein angemessenes und wirksames Risikomanagement einrichten, um menschenrechtliche oder umweltbezogene Risiken oder Verletzungen zu erkennen. Diese Risikoanalyse ist jährlich bzw. anlassbezogen durchzuführen (§ 5 LkSG Abs. 4).

In Bezug auf die regelmäßige Risikoanalyse führt das BAFA eine wichtige Unterscheidung ein:

Die abstrakte Risikoanalyse

Hier wird aufgrund vorhandener Stammdaten, Einkaufsvolumen und ggf. unter Einbezug von Risikodaten eine erste Priorisierung vorgenommen. Diese Risikoanalyse reicht allerdings alleine nicht aus, sondern ist durch die konkrete Risikoanalyse zu plausibilisieren.

Die konkrete Risikoanalyse

Hier werden die Ergebnisse der abstrakten Risikoanalyse plausibilisiert. Hierbei spielt der spezifische Kontext, das heißt auch individuelle Primärinformationen über die Lieferanten, eine wichtige Rolle. Risiken sollen gewichtet und priorisiert werden und so das Gefahrenpotenzial eingeschätzt werden. Hierbei spielen Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit und Schwere der Verletzung eine wichtige Rolle.

Die anlassbezogene Risikoanalyse

Des Weiteren ist anlassbezogen eine Risikoanalyse durchzuführen. Dies gilt entweder bei Veränderung der Geschäftstätigkeit oder bei substituierter Kenntnis von Verletzungen einer menschenrechtlichen oder umweltbezogenen Pflicht bei einem oder mehreren mittelbaren Zulieferern.

Darüber hinaus enthält die Handreichung hilfreiche Informationen zu den Daten, die zur Beschaffungsstruktur erfasst werden sollten sowie im Anhang II einen Überblick über Umsetzungshilfen (Berichte und Leitfäden) für die Ermittlung von menschenrechtlichen und umweltbezogenen Risiken.

Whitepaper:
Risikomanagement für Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette

So setzen Sie die Anforderungen des Lieferkettengesetzes durch ­Digitalisierung und Kollaboration zukunftsfähig um!

Whitepaper downloaden

Wie unterstützt VERSO die verschiedenen Risikoanalysen?

Sowohl für die abstrakte als auch für die konkrete Risikoanalyse sind eine Vielzahl von Daten effizient einzuholen und auszuwerten. Unsere Cloud Plattform unterstützt hier optimal.

Abstrakte Risikoanalyse: Wesentliche länderbasierte Risikoindizes sind in der VERSO Supply Chain Plattform integriert und können mittels einer Heat Map übersichtlich ausgewertet werden. So können Sie ihre Lieferantendaten zielgerichtet ergänzen.

Konkrete Risikoanalyse: Hier unterstützten wir im Kern, indem Sie Lieferanten mit abstrakten Risiken ganz einfach in die Überprüfung geben können, und mittels Selbstauskünften und Nachweisen eine Aussage zu den getroffenen Maßnahmen zur Risikominimierung erhalten. Die kritischen Lieferanten lassen sich dann anhand der geographischen Lage der Betriebsstätten und den verbundenen Länderrisiken und der Beschäftigtenzahl noch weiter priorisieren.

Anlassbezogene Risikoanalyse: Unser Lieferketten-Mapping ermöglicht die schnelle Überprüfung von Risiken bei substantiierter Kenntnis von Verstößen bei mittelbaren Zulieferern. Ergänzen Sie ihre Risikoanalyse zudem jederzeit für neue Geschäftsbereiche, in dem Sie neuen Lieferanten auf die Plattform einladen.


* Bei diesen Informationen handelt es sich um redaktionell zusammengefassten Content, der nicht als Rechtsberatung zu verstehen ist. VERSO übernimmt keine Haftung. 

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

Mann sitzt nachdenklich am Laptop – die Risikoanalyse für das LkSG ist mit vielen Fragen verbunden
11.01.2023

Kickstart LkSG – This is what matters

Read article
Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO
05.01.2023

The importance and future of sustainable supply chains: Interview with Klaus Wiesen

Read article

Abonnieren Sie unsere Newsletter!

Tragen Sie sich ein und erhalten Sie regelmäßig Neuigkeiten zu:

  • Aktuellen ESG-Themen und Gesetzesänderungen
  • Best Practices aus den Bereichen ESG und nachhaltige Lieferketten
  • News zu VERSO
  • Sustainability Events uvm.

Jetzt anmelden!

Gespiegelte Blätter – Symbolbild für die doppelte Wesentlichkeit
23.05.2022

What does double materiality mean?

The EU has introduced the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive). 15,000 companies in Germany must now prepare sustainability reports. Their content is determined by the principle of materiality. The introduction of the CSRD enshrines dual materiality. Read what’s behind it.

Definition: Was bedeutet doppelte Wesentlichkeit?

Double materiality means: it must be stated
how sustainability aspects affect the company (outside-in perspective)
AND
how the company affects society and the environment (inside-out perspective). The dual materiality will change the materiality principle used in Germany in particular and lead to significantly more information being relevant to reporting and CSR reports becoming more meaningful as a result. In future, companies will have to state both perspectives – independently of each other – in the sustainability report. Previously, both aspects had to be fulfilled at the same time. In the case of the outside-in perspective (“financial materiality”), disclosures must be made that are necessary for an understanding of the company’s business performance, results or position. Particularly in the world of finance, this perspective is often the only one considered today and referred to as “ESG” or “ESG-related risks” – in other words, only the risk perspective is considered from a sustainability perspective. With the inside-out perspective (“environmental and social materiality”), information must be provided that is necessary for an understanding of the impact of business activities on sustainability aspects. In short, it must be explained: What impact does my company have on the planet and society?

Infografik: Erklärung doppelte Wesentlichkeit der CSRD

The ESRS standards at a glance

With the new CSRD reporting obligation, the EU is also introducing uniform European standards for comparable sustainability standards – the ESRS. Get an overview in the factsheet.

Download factsheet on the ESRS

The outside-in perspective

Many companies have so far focused on the outside-in perspective, as it represents a form of risk management. This field will also be covered in the future. The information is primarily aimed at investors. From the outside-in perspective, companies must disclose the following information:

  • How do external developments affect the business model, strategy and sales, among other things? External developments include unexpected weather events, for example, but also stricter regulatory requirements.
  • Industry-specific topics also play a role: Are there sustainability aspects that have already been identified by competitors, customers or suppliers?
  • What are the main risks for the company, a product or a service? And how are they managed or mitigated?

How do I create a sustainability report?

Creating a meaningful sustainability report can be quite a challenge. It’s easier with our practice-oriented playbook “7 steps to a sustainability report”.

Download Playbook

The inside-out perspective

The inside-out perspective significantly broadens the view. Contact persons are not only investors, but also employees, consumers and environmental and social organizations. From the inside-out perspective, companies must disclose how their activities affect society and the environment. The impact of products, services and business relationships (including the supply chain) should also be mentioned here. Information is required on, among other things

Environmental issues:

  • Climate impact
  • Prevention and reduction of environmental pollution
  • Environmental impact of energy use
  • Biodiversity

Social:

  • Health and safety in the workplace
  • Diversity and equal treatment
  • Human rights
  • Social commitment

Governance:

  • Management and control processes
  • Combating corruption and bribery

Additional information also in the VERSO Academy

In 12 Wochen zum/zur ESG-Manager:in – die VERSO Academy führt Sie durch den kompletten ESG-Managementbericht. Von Standards bis doppelte Wesentlichkeit.

Find out more

The goal of dual materiality

With the introduction of the new CSR reporting obligation CSRD, the European Union wants to increase the scope of sustainability disclosures. This will make CSR reports more meaningful and comparable. The impact of the sustainability report will also be increased because the dual materiality contributes to a shift from a shareholder perspective to a stakeholder perspective. The CSR report is aimed at investors, but also at employees, customers and society.

We help you with your sustainability report

The new CSR reporting obligation CSRD will not only affect more companies. They will also face a major challenge due to the double materiality. VERSO will guide you through the report.

How VERSO helps

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

This might also interest you:

Der Aufbau der ESRS: SO berichten Sie CSRD-konform.
28.11.2024

ESRS report structure: How to report in compliance with CSRD

Read article
Doppelte Wesentlichkeitsanalyse
27.11.2024

Mastering CSRD challenges: The double materiality analysis in seven steps

Read article

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Current ESG topics and legislative changes
  • Best practices in the areas of ESG and sustainable supply chains
  • News about VERSO
  • Sustainability events and much more.

Sign up now!

Containerschiff als Symbolbild für Lieferketten
30.08.2021

Erklärung für das Lieferkettengesetz: Was Unternehmen beachten müssen

Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte beeinflussen immer stärker das Einkaufsverhalten der Kunden. Unternehmen müssen deswegen auch in ihrer Lieferkette auf Themen wie CO2-Reduktion und Einhaltung von Menschenrechten achten. Experte Klaus Wiesen gibt eine Erklärung, welche Unternehmen vom Lieferkettengesetz betroffen sind und was sie beachten müssen.

Für welche Unternehmen gilt das Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz, kurz das Lieferkettengesetz? Und ab wann?

Das Gesetz gilt ab 2023 für Unternehmen mit Hauptsitz in Deutschland und für in Deutschland registrierte Unternehmen mit über 3000 Mitarbeitern. Ab 2024 liegt der Schwellenwert bei 1000 Mitarbeitern. Indirekt sind aber sehr viel mehr Unternehmen betroffen: Entweder als Zulieferer, der Anforderungen von unter das Gesetz fallende Kunden erfüllen muss, oder als Unternehmen, das in Sachen Nachhaltigkeitsstandards mit größeren Wettbewerbern mitziehen sollte.

Die neuen Sorgfaltspflichten beziehen sich auf verschiedene Ebenen der Lieferketten. Welche sind das?

Die Lieferkette bezieht sich auf alle Produkte und Dienstleistungen eines Unternehmens. Das Gesetz umfasst das Handeln des eigenen Geschäftsbereichs und das der unmittelbaren Zulieferer sowie in einigen Fällen auch der mittelbaren Zulieferer.

Ich empfehle Unternehmen aber, sich nicht in den Details des LkSG zu verlieren. Entscheidend ist es, jetzt ein robustes Risikomanagement in Einklang mit den UN Guiding Principles (UN-Leitprinzipien für Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte) aufzubauen, und so auch Anforderungen anderer nationaler Gesetze sowie des kommenden Gesetzes auf der EU-Ebene an die menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht zu erfüllen.

Die neuen Sorgfaltspflichten beziehen sich auf verschiedene Ebenen der Lieferketten. Welche sind das?

Die Lieferkette bezieht sich auf alle Produkte und Dienstleistungen eines Unternehmens. Das Gesetz umfasst das Handeln des eigenen Geschäftsbereichs und das der unmittelbaren Zulieferer sowie in einigen Fällen auch der mittelbaren Zulieferer.

Ich empfehle Unternehmen aber, sich nicht in den Details des LkSG zu verlieren. Entscheidend ist es, jetzt ein robustes Risikomanagement in Einklang mit den UN Guiding Principles (UN-Leitprinzipien für Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte) aufzubauen, und so auch Anforderungen anderer nationaler Gesetze sowie des kommenden Gesetzes auf der EU-Ebene an die menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht zu erfüllen.

Die betroffenen Unternehmen müssen künftig eine Risikoanalyse ihrer Lieferkette vornehmen. Auf welche möglichen Missstände müssen sie dabei achten?

Unternehmen müssen in der Risikoanalyse menschenrechtliche und umweltbezogene Risiken beachten. Menschenrechtliche Risiken können zum Beispiel Kinderarbeit, Zwangsarbeit oder missachteter Arbeitsschutz sein. Auf die Umwelt bezogen sind das beispielsweise die Verschmutzung von Luft oder Gewässern, aber auch das unsachgemäße Entsorgen von Abfällen.  

Mit welchen Konsequenzen müssen Unternehmen rechnen, wenn sie die neuen Regeln des Lieferkettengesetzes nicht (rechtzeitig) einhalten?

Verstößt ein Unternehmen gegen das Gesetz können je nach Schwere des Verstoßes Geldstrafen bis zu 8 Millionen Euro verhängt werden. Für Unternehmen mit einem Jahresumsatz von mehr als 400 Millionen Euro kann die Strafe bis zu 2 Prozent des jährlichen Umsatzes betragen. Außerdem droht der Ausschluss von öffentlichen Auftragsvergaben.

Doch es geht um viel mehr, als nur Strafen zu vermeiden. Es droht der Verlust der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, sollte Nachhaltigkeit nicht ernst genommen werden. Somit sollten Unternehmen das Gesetz als Chance sehen, sich jetzt für die Zukunft aufzustellen. 

 

Welchen Schritt sollten Unternehmen als Erstes machen, um die neuen Regeln ab Inkrafttreten einzuhalten?

Zunächst sollten die Verantwortlichkeiten im Unternehmen festgelegt werden. Das LkSG erfordert das Benennen einer oder eines Menschenrechtsbeauftragten. Doch ich empfehle, es nicht dabei zu belassen. Es gilt insbesondere, den Einkauf miteinzubeziehen und Prozesse für eine nachhaltige Beschaffung zu etablieren.

 

Auch auf europäischer Ebene wird über ein Lieferkettengesetz diskutiert. Müssen deutsche Unternehmen dann mit noch schärferen Regeln rechnen?

Ja, davon ist auszugehen. Das Thema Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette wird aber nicht nur durch dieses Gesetz weiter an Bedeutung gewinnen. Der fortschreitende Klimawandel   erfordert die Dekarbonisierung von globalen Lieferketten, weshalb fast jedes Unternehmen tätig werden muss. Und wer Nachhaltigkeit in der Lieferkette adressiert, sollte sich nicht nur auf einen Nachhaltigkeitsaspekt beschränken.

Egal ob Klimaschutz oder menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht, es bedarf dafür zum einen klarer Prozesse und zum anderen Transparenz in der Vorlieferkette. Hat man diese Grundlagen erreicht, lassen sich alle Nachhaltigkeitsthemen proaktiv managen.

Consulting

Klaus Wiesen

Klaus Wiesen ist Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO. Er war Mitgründer von sustainabill, das nun als Teil von VERSO unseren Kunden dabei hilft, Transparenz in Lieferketten zu bringen und so Risiken zu managen, Menschenrechte sicherzustellen und Klima-Emissionen zu verringern. Vor der Gründung von sustainabill war er Teamleiter beim Wuppertal Institut, einem international führenden Think Tank für anwendungsorientierte Nachhaltigkeitsforschung. Klaus Wiesen ist außerdem einer von neun Nachhaltigkeitsexpert:innen beim 12-Wochen-Programm der VERSO Academy.

Zur VERSO Academy
Klaus Wiesen, Head of Sustainable Supply Chains bei VERSO

* Bei diesen Informationen handelt es sich um redaktionell zusammengefassten Content, der nicht als Rechtsberatung zu verstehen ist. VERSO übernimmt keine Haftung. 

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

Riese & Müller: supply chain transparency with VERSO

Read story
LKW auf einer Landstraße als Symbolbild für die Lieferkette
28.03.2024

Why is climate protection relevant in the supply chain?

Read article

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter!

Tragen Sie sich ein und erhalten Sie regelmäßig Neuigkeiten zu:

  • Aktuellen ESG-Themen und Gesetzesänderungen
  • Best Practices aus den Bereichen ESG und nachhaltige Lieferketten
  • News zu VERSO
  • Sustainability Events uvm.

Jetzt anmelden!