Meeresschildkröte, die durch Plastikmüll schwimmt: Mit der neuen EU-Richtlinie gegen Greenwashing sollen solche Bilder seltener werden
10.06.2026

From the Green Claims Directive to EmpCo: The New Rules Against Greenwashing Starting September 2026

The Green Claims Directive was intended to establish clear, EU-wide rules against greenwashing, but it was withdrawn in June 2025. Instead, EmpCo becomes binding. As a result, new requirements take effect on September 27, 2026, governing which environmental claims companies are still permitted to make.

Green Claims Directive & EmpCo: Tools Against Greenwashing

The Green Claims Directive was intended to establish clear, EU-wide rules against greenwashing, but it was withdrawn in June 2025. Instead, EmpCo becomes binding. As a result, new requirements take effect on September 27, 2026, governing which environmental claims companies are still permitted to make. In this article, we provide an overview of the developments surrounding greenwashing regulation and take a closer look at the requirements introduced by the new EmpCo.

Many Environmental Claims Do Not Hold Up to Scrutiny

In January 2023, DIE ZEIT and The Guardian published an investigation into Verra, the leading provider of carbon credits. According to their findings, a portion of the emission credits that companies used to offset their greenhouse gas emissions did not deliver real reductions. A study by the European Commission painted a similar picture: more than half the environmental claims made by companies in the EU were vague or misleading, and roughly 40% were entirely unsubstantiated. Many green labels are of little help either, since half of them are barely verified, if at all.

The result is something most people know from their own experience: consumers can barely tell which claim actually delivers on its promise. And companies that properly substantiate their statements get lost in the jungle of labels and claims.

Greenwashing: The 5 Biggest Pitfalls

100% sustainable, climate-neutral, or bioplastic – what’s printed on a product isn’t always accurate. Greenwashing often happens unintentionally. In this article on the five most common pitfalls, you’ll learn what the traps are and how to avoid them.

The Green Claims Directive Was Meant to Address This, but It’s Off the Table

On March 22, 2023, the EU Commission presented a draft of the Green Claims Directive (GCD). It was intended to require companies to substantiate their environmental claims scientifically, have them independently verified, and communicate them transparently.

But it didn’t get that far. In June 2025, the EU Commission withdrew the proposal after it lacked a majority in the trilogue and, among others, Italy and the EPP withdrew their support. The main criticism centered on the anticipated bureaucratic burden and the planned inclusion of micro-enterprises.

Anyone breathing a sigh of relief now, however, is mistaken. The Green Claims Directive is not the only regulation against greenwashing, just the best known. The requirements that will actually affect companies starting in fall 2026 have long been settled.

What Is Now Binding: The EmpCo Directive

The Empowering Consumers Directive (EmpCo, an EU directive) already entered into force on March 26, 2024. Member states had to transpose it into national law by March 27, 2026, and it must be applied as binding law starting September 27, 2026. In Germany, implementation takes place through an amendment to the Act Against Unfair Competition (UWG).

EmpCo regulates much of what the Green Claims Directive set out to do, just through a different mechanism: not through a new verification procedure, but through existing competition law. Certain environmental claims will henceforth be considered inherently unfair. This means there is no longer any need for a case-by-case assessment of whether a claim is misleading, it is simply prohibited.

Which Claims EmpCo Prohibits Starting September 2026

EmpCo identifies four categories that will no longer be permitted without solid evidence:

  1. General environmental claims without recognized proof of performance
    Terms such as “environmentally friendly,” “green,” “eco,” “sustainable,” “climate-friendly,” or “biodegradable” may only be used if backed by recognized, outstanding environmental performance. This also applies to implicit claims: green leaves, globe symbols, or water droplets on packaging likewise fall under this rule if they suggest an environmental benefit that is not substantiated.
  2. Carbon-neutrality claims based on offsetting
    Statements such as “climate-neutral” or “carbon-neutral” that rely on purchased credits are no longer permitted. Climate-related claims must refer to real emission reductions within the company’s own value chain.
  3. Self-created sustainability labels
    In-house “eco” or “green” logos without an independent basis are prohibited. Only labels based on a system recognized by authorities or certified by independent third parties remain permissible.
  4. Whole-product claims for a partial aspect
    Anyone who prints “made with recycled material” on a product when only the packaging is meant leaves themselves open to challenge. The precise version that transparently states the scope remains permitted, for example, “packaging is made from 90% recycled PET.”

One important point here: forward-looking promises such as “climate-neutral by 2030” are not prohibited outright, but they are subject to conditions. They must be based on a measurable, verifiable implementation plan and monitored by an independent body.

Who Does EmpCo Apply To?

The directive affects all companies that market products or services to consumers in the EU, regardless of size, revenue, or industry. Manufacturers based outside the EU are also covered as soon as they target EU end customers. Unlike the Green Claims Directive that was under discussion, EmpCo does not exempt micro-enterprises.

What’s at Stake for Violations of EmpCo

Advertising with unsubstantiated environmental claims will be subject to cease-and-desist actions and can be penalized with fines. In the case of serious violations, fines of up to 4% of annual revenue in the member state concerned are possible. On top of this come reputational risks: a publicly challenged claim often damages credibility more than any fine.

This is not an entirely new risk, by the way. Back in June 2024, the Federal Court of Justice ruled that advertising a product as “climate-neutral” without explaining whether this is based on avoidance or offsetting is misleading. EmpCo merely makes enforcement considerably easier starting September 2026.

What You Should Do Now

The deadline for implementing EmpCo is no longer far off. Anyone planning product packaging, campaigns, or website copy with a longer lead time is already working today on material that will go live in September 2026.

Three steps are worth taking now:

  • Claim inventory: Which environmental claims are you currently using—on packaging, your website, in advertising, and in your sustainability report?
  • Evidence mapping: For each claim, check whether solid evidence exists and where it is located.
  • Approval process: Define who signs off on an environmental claim before it is published, so that marketing, legal, and sustainability work together.

The core principle remains simple: you may only claim what you can prove. And that requires a solid data foundation. Greenwashing rarely stems from intent. It usually arises when sustainability is communicated without a sound data basis.

We support you with your sustainability communication

Solid claims require solid data. With the VERSO ESG Hub, you capture your sustainability data in a structured and traceable way, from the data source through to the reporting basis. This makes it possible to demonstrate what each claim is based on. For the communication itself, our Sustainability Consultants support you. They help you publish meaningful information while staying truthful, whether in your sustainability report or in other internal and external formats.

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Current ESG topics and legislative changes
  • Individual advice from the VERSO experts
  • News about VERSO
  • Sustainability Events and more

Sign up now!

EU-Flaggen: Die EU hat zur Umsetzung des Green Deal drei wichtige Richtlinien in Kraft gesetzt
21.08.2023

The EU ESG guidelines and how they relate to each other

The European Union’s Green Deal

With its Green Deal, the European Union wants to make the EU climate-neutral by 2050 and channel financial flows into sustainable projects and companies. The extensive program also includes three important ESG guidelines and regulations for sustainability reporting:

  • EU taxonomy,
  • Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and
  • Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

But how are they connected and why are all three important for companies?

EU taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR briefly explained

Before we take a closer look at the relationship between the EU taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR, we will first look at the three EU requirements individually. The European Union adopted the EU Green Deal back in 2019. The program provides for extensive measures that penetrate deep into the economy and industry. This also includes the three directives.

Der European Green Deal im Überblick

EU taxonomy

The EU taxonomy came into force on January 1, 2022 and defines which economic activities can be classified as sustainable. The regulation sets out criteria for climate and environmentally friendly activities and products. Accordingly, an economic activity must

  • make a substantial contribution to at least one of the six environmental goals,
  • do not compromise one or more of the other environmental objectives, and
  • in compliance with the minimum protection (OECD Guidelines).

Further information can be found in our factsheet on the EU taxonomy.

CSRD

While the EU taxonomy focuses on activities and products, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive focuses on the company level. The CSRD will be introduced in stages from 2024 and regulates sustainability reporting by companies. Ultimately, around 15,000 companies in Germany and around 50,000 in the EU will be affected by the directive.

The CSRD creates a uniform framework for the disclosure of ESG (environmental, social and governance) data. In this context, there is a binding reporting standard in the European Union for the first time: the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Further information can be found in our factsheet on the CSRD.

SFDR

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation came into force on March 10, 2021. It obliges financial market participants such as private equity, venture capital and fund companies as well as financial advisors to disclose sustainability information on their products and portfolios. The increased transparency is intended to ensure that environmental and social factors are given greater consideration when making investment and financing decisions. A commitment to “sustainable finance”, so to speak. Further information can be found in our factsheet on the SFDR.

The relationship between the EU taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR

Transparency is crucial to channeling more money into sustainable projects and companies. Customers, employees, investors and many other individuals and groups demand detailed information on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. The interaction between the EU Taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR sets the framework for the disclosure of sustainability aspects. The mutual relationships between the EU Taxonomy, CSRD and SFDR can be clearly seen in our illustration.

As you can see, the three sets of rules are closely interrelated and even overlap in terms of content. First of all, the EU Taxonomy provides a classification system for sustainable economic activities, which is applied within the framework of the CSRD and SFRD.

Zusammenhang von CSRD, SFDR und EU-Taxonomie

How do I create a sustainability report?

Creating a meaningful sustainability report can be quite a challenge.
It’s easier with our playbook “7 steps to a sustainability report”.

The CSRD obliges companies to report on various ESG aspects. Affected companies must also provide information on three key indicators of the EU taxonomy – namely the proportion of taxonomy-eligible economic activities

  • of total sales
  • in capital expenditure (CapEx) and
  • operating expenses (OpEx).

The EU taxonomy and CSRD also play a role in the SFDR. Financial market participants and financial advisors must report on key figures from the EU taxonomy for their ESG financial products that promote environmental or social characteristics or have a completely sustainable investment objective. This requires information on the proportion of a financial product that invests in taxonomy-compliant activities.

For example, information is requested on greenhouse gas emissions, consumption and production of non-renewable energy, wage differences and gender diversity.

The financial service providers in turn obtain this sustainability-related information from the CSRD reports of the companies in which they invest. However, there is currently a certain amount of tension.

The CSRD, i.e. the obligation to prepare a sustainability report, does not yet apply to many companies. It will be introduced in stages from 2024. The group of companies subject to reporting requirements will only gradually expand from 2025. However, due to the SFDR, many companies already have to report sustainability information to financial market participants if they require a loan or investment. It is therefore clear that it is worthwhile for companies to start reporting and collecting data at an early stage.

The most important sustainability standards

The factsheet on the most important standards gives you an overview of what is suitable for your company now – quickly and reliably.

Why is sustainability important for companies?

There are numerous reasons to make a company more sustainable. Firstly, there is growing pressure from outside – from regulatory requirements, for example, but also from customers, business partners and competitors.
But current and potential employees are also paying more attention to how their (future) employer acts and whether this is compatible with their views.

Sustainability can therefore provide a competitive advantage, strengthen the brand, increase employee motivation, retain customers and create new jobs, among other things. As we have seen above, it also helps in the search for investors. And, of course, a company makes a contribution to protecting our planet. You can find numerous studies that prove this in the blog post “Why is sustainability important for companies?”.

We support you with the ESG report

You should therefore start collecting the relevant sustainability information in your company at an early stage. You can save yourself a lot of time and effort by using specialized sustainability software such as the VERSO ESG Hub.

Our sustainability experts will also support you throughout the entire reporting process – from the materiality analysis, strategy and carbon footprint to the final reporting.

* This information is summarized editorial content and should not be construed as legal advice. VERSO accepts no liability.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Sign up and receive regular news about:

  • Pragmatic all-in-one solution for ESG reporting, climate and supply chain management
  • Best practices in the areas of ESG and sustainable supply chains
  • Developed with expertise from 12+ years of sustainability management
  • Sustainability events and much more.

Get to know the software!