Krötenbaby auf einem Finger – Symbolbild für die Verantwortung, die ESG bedeutet
13.08.2025

ESG Standards and Frameworks: An Overview

Get to know the key standards and frameworks for ESG management and reporting.

ESRS

About:

The European reporting standard ESRS was introduced as part of the EU CSRD Directive. Its aim is to improve the quality and comparability of sustainability reports.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

Companies required to prepare a CSRD report.

Advantages:

  • EU-wide comparability
  • Simplified versions for SMEs

Disadvantages:

  • High complexity
  • Very extensive

Other:

Phased implementation depending on company size

VSME

About:

The Voluntary Standard for Small and Midsized Enterprises (VSME) enables meaningful sustainability reporting without the effort required for the “full” ESRS.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

Midsized companies that want to showcase their sustainability performance without being subject to CSRD requirements – officially recommended by the EU Commission in July 2025.

Advantages:

  • Clear framework for reporting and communication
  • Modular structure with flexible effort levels

Disadvantages:

  • No mandatory assurance

Other:

Voluntary standard.

Factsheet: VSME in Detail

All key information on the VSME – from its benefits for midsized companies to its structure, including a comparison with the ESRS.

GRI

About:

The GRI Standard has existed since 1999 and has been continuously developed since then. It provides companies with a framework to measure and disclose their progress in the ESG areas.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

Primarily large international companies.

Advantages:

  • Strong international recognition
  • Developed in dialogue with stakeholders
  • Serves as a foundation for management systems

Disadvantages:

  • Very extensive
  • High effort required
  • Losing relevance in the EU due to ESRS

Other:

Voluntary reporting standard, but its content is reflected in the ESRS.

DNK

About:

The German Sustainability Code (DNK) is a national reporting standard. With the CSRD, it is being restructured into a support tool for companies to facilitate CSRD implementation.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

According to the DNK, all companies required – or willing – to report under CSRD.

Advantages:

  • Aims to simplify CSRD reporting

Disadvantages:

  • No materiality assessment included

SDG

About:

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the UN’s 17 sustainability goals. They serve as a global framework that companies can use to report on their contribution to these objectives.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

Any company.

Advantages:

  • Good for getting started
  • Globally recognized
  • Complementary framework
  • Helpful for communication

Disadvantages:

  • Requirements must be translated individually
  • No specific corporate guidelines

Other:

Voluntary framework – SDG logos may be used for non-commercial purposes.

UNGC

About:

The UN Global Compact (UNGC) is an international network promoting 10 principles in the areas of human rights, labor standards, environment, and anti-corruption. It also offers a reporting framework.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

Any company.

Advantages:

  • Good for getting started
  • Large network and database
  • Strong support from the UN and partner organizations

Disadvantages:

  • Less structured and specific
  • No binding control

Other:

Voluntary framework – members may use UNGC logos for non-commercial purposes.

ISO 14001

About:

ISO 14001 is an international standard for environmental management systems. It helps companies systematically identify and continuously improve their environmental impacts.

Focus areas:

  • Environment

Relevant for:

Any company.

Advantages:

  • Certification available
  • Internationally recognized
  • Enables systematic improvement of environmental performance

Disadvantages:

  • Environmental audit only recommended
  • Environmental statement not required to be published

Other:

Often required in tenders.

ISO 26000

About:

ISO 26000 is an international guideline on social responsibility. It provides recommendations for integrating sustainable and responsible practices into strategies and processes.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

Any company.

Advantages:

  • Well suited for the development of sustainability processes
  • Comprehensive approach
  • Flexible application

Disadvantages:

  • No certification, therefore less recognized

Other:

ISO 26000 serves as a practical guideline and can be useful in tenders.

EMAS

About:

The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) is a standard for environmental management systems. It goes beyond ISO 14001 by requiring, among other things, a public and detailed environmental statement.

Focus areas:

  • Environment

Relevant for:

Any company – especially large enterprises and corporations.

Advantages:

  • Certification available
  • Public register promotes transparency
  • Strengthens the environmental image
  • Simplified variant for SMEs

Disadvantages:

  • More demanding than ISO 14001

Other:

EMAS certification includes regular external environmental audits.

ISSB

About:

The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) develops a global standard for capital market-oriented companies to ensure consistent and comparable sustainability disclosures.

Focus areas:

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Relevant for:

Primarily capital market-oriented and international companies.

Advantages:

  • Integrates and harmonizes central elements of existing frameworks
  • Aims to become the leading global standard

Disadvantages:

  • High implementation effort

Other:

Voluntary reporting standard, but content is reflected in ESRS.

TCFD

About:

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) provides recommendations for companies on how to report the financial impacts of climate change on their business.

Focus areas:

  • Climate

Relevant for:

Primarily the financial sector and capital market-oriented companies.

Advantages:

  • Provides insights into climate-related risks and opportunities
  • Consistent and standardized reporting

Disadvantages:

  • Limited to climate-related impacts
  • Implementation can be challenging

Other:

Voluntary reporting standard, but content is reflected in ESRS.

*This information is summarized editorial content and should not be considered legal advice. VERSO assumes no liability.